Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 27 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,560,540 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylux
Feminists don't like women who stick by their cheating men, so if she plays the sympathy card, it will have an opposite impact on her base.
She also demonized those women, and there's no defense for her on that one.
Those women knew Bill Clinton was married. He is just as much to blame as they are, but that in no way makes them immune to criticism for sleeping with a married man.
He did the same to Cruz (Lyin') (Questioned citizenship).
He did it to Carson (reenactment of stabbing story).
----------------
When all is said and done, he'll minimize it and say it was all an act to get voters - and it has/does......it is his preemptive strike because he knows that women's issues, respect for women is one of his many weaknesses and Clinton was going to hit him on it. To Americans, Bill Clinton's issues are old news. Long forgotten. Forgiven. Trump is a worthless piece of **** for bringing it up again. It was a bad period in our history. He's using it for his own purposes just like the used 9/11.
This is just dumb. It means every woman whose husband, boyfriend, partner has cheated on her is now labeled an enabler by the presumptuous GOP nominee. I assume that would include Ivana Trump and Marla Maples. Hope he remembers to bash them also.
The guy ought to just talk about why he should be president and stop talking about a man who was POTUS in the 90s, who has been married since almost before Trump's wife was born, AND whose marriage has lasted way longer than any of Trump's many marriages. Quite admirable to be married as long as the Clintons, even with all the issues. So much easier to switch out wives.
Meanwhile, Trump's crude sexual history is being put front and center. Dumb move.
“You could’ve gotten her, right?” Stern asked Trump on-air shortly after Princess Diana’s death in 1997. “You could’ve nailed her.”
“I think I could have,” Trump said.
How about singer Mariah Carey? “Would you bang her?” Stern asked. Trump replied, “I would do it without hesitation.”
Whether she "enabled" or not...she chose to STAY with the cheating bastard for her own gain.... We do NOT need this person to "lead" our country...or we will be lead into the pits!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
