Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2016, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,291,973 times
Reputation: 19953

Advertisements

Great--but all we keep hearing is how this election is really really different than other elections.

And the opposition of the incumbents were, at the very least, sane--unlike this election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2016, 04:37 PM
 
5,347 posts, read 7,208,438 times
Reputation: 7158
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Nope. GW Bush won the popular vote in 2004.

Yeah that's the one time. History is not on their side
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2016, 04:42 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,549,207 times
Reputation: 18618
The last time a major party's Nominee was a woman was ....?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2016, 06:48 PM
 
1,309 posts, read 1,161,618 times
Reputation: 1768
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
History is not on Hillary's side. Last time a Democrat was elected to succeed a Democrat President leaving office was apparently before the Civil War. 1856.

Based on this trend alone, Trump will be the next President of the USA.

History Is Not On The Democrats Side


Arf Arf
Nice try but Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman were elected in their own right. Al Gore also won the popular vote and would've followed a Democratic president without blatant cheating on Bush's part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2016, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,221 posts, read 22,418,120 times
Reputation: 23860
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I've got no idea what this is supposed to mean. President is elected by electoral vote.

History is against Hillary.
Nope. The 21st century has already shown itself to be very different from the 20th, which was radically different from the 19th.

Your example is too old to have any meaningful connection to today's events. And for a fact, this is the second election that has multiple firsts in it. The 2008 election was the first time the U.S. could have had a female Vice President, a female President, or a black President, no matter how it was decided.

This election has a complete political outsider who has never held any govt. position, nor any party position, nor any military position in his life vs. a female.

And this century isn't even 20 years old yet.

Your example came from a time when females weren't even allowed to vote, much less run for office. It's way too much of a stretch to be pertinent now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2016, 09:08 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,135,313 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
History is not on Hillary's side. Last time a Democrat was elected to succeed a Democrat President leaving office was apparently before the Civil War. 1856.

Based on this trend alone, Trump will be the next President of the USA.

History Is Not On The Democrats Side


Arf Arf
When you were gleefully casting a vote for Obama in 2008, you didn't let anyone tell you that no black man has ever been elected as POTUS since the beginning of times. . . . . . 1856 is very recent in comparison. To quote your another favorite, Jesse Jackson, "Keep the Hope Alive!"

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2016, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,584,853 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
History is not on Hillary's side. Last time a Democrat was elected to succeed a Democrat President leaving office was apparently before the Civil War. 1856.

Based on this trend alone, Trump will be the next President of the USA.

History Is Not On The Democrats Side


Arf Arf
Stand by for an historic inauguration in January. One that'll result in much whining and whimpering from the right.

No First Lady has ever been elected. And that goes back further than 1856.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2016, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Renton - Fairwood, Washington
759 posts, read 638,992 times
Reputation: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
History is not on Hillary's side. Last time a Democrat was elected to succeed a Democrat President leaving office was apparently before the Civil War. 1856.

Based on this trend alone, Trump will be the next President of the USA.

History Is Not On The Democrats Side


Arf Arf

Here's another trend...

Dating back 60 years only once has a party won 3 straight terms. (Reagan 80, 84, Bush 88) In every other election following 2+ terms (1952, 1960, 1968, 1976, 1992, 2000, 2008) the other party won.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolZombie View Post
Nice try but Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman were elected in their own right. Al Gore also won the popular vote and would've followed a Democratic president without blatant cheating on Bush's part.
I LOL'ed... Too bad Gore couldn't win his home state of Tennessee... he was the first candidate to fail to do that since McGovern in 1972. He also lost WV... a state that had voted Democratic in 5 of the last 6 elections.

Bush is also the first Republican in American history to win the presidency without winning Vermont or Illinois, the second Republican to win the presidency without winning California (Garfield in 1880 the first) or Pennsylvania (Nixon in 1968 was the first), and the only winning Republican not to receive any electoral votes from California (Garfield received one vote in 1880). Bush also lost in Connecticut, the state of his birth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2016, 07:51 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,349 posts, read 54,484,569 times
Reputation: 40786
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChloeC View Post
Here's another trend...

Dating back 60 years only once has a party won 3 straight terms. (Reagan 80, 84, Bush 88) In every other election following 2+ terms (1952, 1960, 1968, 1976, 1992, 2000, 2008) the other party won.
But, when was the last time the GOP ran a NY liberal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2016, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Renton - Fairwood, Washington
759 posts, read 638,992 times
Reputation: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
But, when was the last time the GOP ran a NY liberal?
Any worse than the Dems running a candidate who should be in prison?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top