Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2016, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,115,957 times
Reputation: 11535

Advertisements

She reminds me of a bad cup of coffee early in the morning on a lonely interstate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2016, 09:56 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Not only had illegal servers to by-pass the security of the US Government, she tried to destroy all evidence of wrong doing and criminal acts with our nations security... During an investigation.

Last edited by CaseyB; 08-23-2016 at 10:21 AM.. Reason: response to deletion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 10:56 AM
 
Location: New York
2,251 posts, read 4,917,416 times
Reputation: 1617
.

Another bad day for Hillary.....lol!!

Press release Off Trump's Website https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-r...nton-on-emails


The Wall Street Journal Editorial Headline: “Clinton’s Colin Powell Excuse”
  • ...When she got caught, Mrs. Clinton cherry-picked the emails she’d turn over to State and tried to destroy the rest.
New York Post Editorial Headline: “Another E-Mail Dump, More Proof Of Clinton Inc. Sleaze”
  • ... Turns out the FBI found another 14,900 — meaning she ‘missed’ at least a third of what the law required her to fork over. ..ones that top Hillary aide Huma Abedin sent or received on her clintonemail and other non-State accounts. ... these show new cases of special attention for big Clinton Foundation donors.”
Boston Herald Editorial Headline: “Editorial: Donations Buy Access”
  • ...The latest bunch of Clinton-era State Department emails released yesterday provide a host of instances in which donations to the Clinton Foundation netted the donors access to the secretary herself on an expedited basis....
Sacramento Bee Editorial Headline: “Hillary Clinton Must Steer Clear Of Foundation”
  • ... too many troubling questions and awkward appearances regarding Clinton Foundation donors receiving special access while she was secretary of state. The potential conflicts would become untenable with her in the Oval Office. … But emails – yes, it’s another aspect of the email scandal – have shown donors seeking, and in some cases, getting meetings with Clinton and other top officials.
Investor’s Business Daily Editorial Headline: “Clinton Email Scandal: Is Hillary's Cover-Up Unraveling?”
  • .... the strategy is clear: Clinton will admit to nothing even as more emails dribble out, then when the pattern of criminality becomes clear in October or early November, her campaign will sing that it's ‘old news’ or blame others. And Big Media will ignore it. …
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 11:20 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,068,868 times
Reputation: 3884
But, but, but; the subterfuge, misdirection, lies, influence peddling, exposure of our foreign service strategies and tactics to ugh,, foreign governments, hackers, bribes, government employees on private payrolls (Clinton Family Syndicate, err Foundation)...too many to list,

are not an issue? Sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modification Specialist View Post
.

Another bad day for Hillary.....lol!!

Press release Off Trump's Website https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-r...nton-on-emails


The Wall Street Journal Editorial Headline: “Clinton’s Colin Powell Excuse”
  • ...When she got caught, Mrs. Clinton cherry-picked the emails she’d turn over to State and tried to destroy the rest.
New York Post Editorial Headline: “Another E-Mail Dump, More Proof Of Clinton Inc. Sleaze”
  • ... Turns out the FBI found another 14,900 — meaning she ‘missed’ at least a third of what the law required her to fork over. ..ones that top Hillary aide Huma Abedin sent or received on her clintonemail and other non-State accounts. ... these show new cases of special attention for big Clinton Foundation donors.”
Boston Herald Editorial Headline: “Editorial: Donations Buy Access”
  • ...The latest bunch of Clinton-era State Department emails released yesterday provide a host of instances in which donations to the Clinton Foundation netted the donors access to the secretary herself on an expedited basis....
Sacramento Bee Editorial Headline: “Hillary Clinton Must Steer Clear Of Foundation”
  • ... too many troubling questions and awkward appearances regarding Clinton Foundation donors receiving special access while she was secretary of state. The potential conflicts would become untenable with her in the Oval Office. … But emails – yes, it’s another aspect of the email scandal – have shown donors seeking, and in some cases, getting meetings with Clinton and other top officials.
Investor’s Business Daily Editorial Headline: “Clinton Email Scandal: Is Hillary's Cover-Up Unraveling?”
  • .... the strategy is clear: Clinton will admit to nothing even as more emails dribble out, then when the pattern of criminality becomes clear in October or early November, her campaign will sing that it's ‘old news’ or blame others. And Big Media will ignore it. …
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 11:22 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,734,634 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
More like manufactured dirt.

So far, from the emails all they've shown is certain donors got access to the Clintons, which there is absolutely nothing out of the ordinary. The entire republican party and all their associates have been combing through all the emails and other info on Clinton and no one has found anything that could bring her down.

But dream on, republicans LOL.

They got access to the Department of State. That is a crime since Hillary testified UNDER OATH that she would not use the Clinton Foundation as a conduit during her confirmation hearing to be Sec of State.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-UeXbBo_lI
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Southern Nevada
6,752 posts, read 3,373,552 times
Reputation: 10376
Quote:
Originally Posted by MLSFan View Post
the anti-clinton people have to find some other reason to disqualify her because they can't do it by pointing to her record?
Much has been said about her record and how everything she touched turned to crap. The problem is that the media and liberals refuse to acknowledge any of it.

Not ONE Democrat has ever spoken out against Clinton's scandals or her egregious actions. What are they afraid of? I don't believe there aren't any Democrats that don't like her. It's not like she's the most affable person in the world. Or the most believable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 11:38 AM
 
10,075 posts, read 7,549,150 times
Reputation: 15501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
Much has been said about her record and how everything she touched turned to crap. The problem is that the media and liberals refuse to acknowledge any of it.

Not ONE Democrat has ever spoken out against Clinton's scandals or her egregious actions. What are they afraid of? I don't believe there aren't any Democrats that don't like her. It's not like she's the most affable person in the world. Or the most believable.
It doesn't matter what the democrats thinks... if her record is so bad, how come the GOP isn't using it as an argument? Instead of trying to dig up emails that aren't there.

It's just like how they spent 8 years voting on the ACA instead of actually doing something about it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 01:23 PM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,118,708 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
Much has been said about her record and how everything she touched turned to crap. The problem is that the media and liberals refuse to acknowledge any of it.

Not ONE Democrat has ever spoken out against Clinton's scandals or her egregious actions. What are they afraid of? I don't believe there aren't any Democrats that don't like her. It's not like she's the most affable person in the world. Or the most believable.
You mean the multitude of fake scandals that amounted to nothing?

If the scandals you speak of are actually real, Republicans in Congress would have been all over them rather than just insinuating them like they've been doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,115,957 times
Reputation: 11535
As predicted the main stream media is starting to cover her. All except CNN. They ran a story on how healthy Trump is. In the race to cover the bottom of the trash can CNN leads the pack.

Now HC campaign and State Dept. is under a Judges order to produce.

Save us all the trouble HC. Just fall down in public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 06:07 PM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,981,014 times
Reputation: 1906
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
You mean the multitude of fake scandals that amounted to nothing?

If the scandals you speak of are actually real, Republicans in Congress would have been all over them rather than just insinuating them like they've been doing.
Fake scandals? Lol sorry but wake up. Is it all a republican witch hunt kinda like Hillary blamed the whole Monica thing on until his DNA showed up on a dress? Lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top