Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course he supported Citizens United... he would be very happy to have corporations have the same rights as actual humans. He would be very happy to see Super PACS be able to spend unlimited funds on behalf of him. He would be happy to pay to have politicians "kiss his azz". He said so himself.
It was a filing mistake, a fine was paid, and the matter is closed.
okayyyy... sure. But, hey, does that mean that Bondi didn't get paid $25,000 and then drop the investigation like a hot potato? Nope. He bought her. He bought her cheap. He can call where the money came from that he paid her "a filing mistake" all day, abut it doesn't negate that he paid her.
this has nothing to do with ethics and morals, his only responsibility to himself, his employees and his family is to try and make as much money as possible, is it 'ethical' to leave money on the table? every businessman in this country is looking for an edge, we're all looking for an edge. but, if you're working for ME as a political figure, i'd prefer you not engage in that activity, big difference.
Yes, it does have to do with ethics and morals... one may be successful in business without putting small businesses, investors, and even little gilrs in a financial bind while he tries to "make as much money as possible". He is pond scum, has always been pond scum, and is an enemy of the American people.
okayyyy... sure. But, hey, does that mean that Bondi didn't get paid $25,000 and then drop the investigation like a hot potato? Nope. He bought her. He bought her cheap. He can call where the money came from that he paid her "a filing mistake" all day, abut it doesn't negate that he paid her.
He's running for President of the United States, and he's going to be faced with decisions that reflect not only his own ethics and morals, but the ethics and morals of the nation. Ethics and morals aren't something that you set aside when they aren't convenient. If Trump has felt free to operate without ethics and morals, then he is a man without character. Unfit to be President.
hahaha.. so the more they can pay, the more its justified..
but wait, theres more.. its only justified if you are those TAKING the money.. cough, Clintons.. its those paying for it. that should be criticized.. Today...
Tomorrow of course, we'll have some fake outrage because someone donated to the Trump campaign.. and he took the check.
You guys have ZERO standards, other than a D next to someones name..
Yes, it does have to do with ethics and morals... one may be successful in business without putting small businesses, investors, and even little gilrs in a financial bind while he tries to "make as much money as possible". He is pond scum, has always been pond scum, and is an enemy of the American people.
Pond scum I'd say is someone who takes money from countries that accept the rape and murder of women and children, and then runs around claiming they are fighting for the rights of this segment of society..
Deflect much? You're just upset because of the legitimate accusations against Clinton, which are far more credible.
Accusations against Hillary are made up by the GOP RWNJ media. Nutty Don has found the audience to believe him even tho he lies to them all day every day.
Is Citizens United a charity now? Aren't foundations supposed to be donated to some kind of charity?
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962
The difference is that as Secretary of State Hillary has a great deal of power to impact all Americans. As a public servant she and all others in that position should be held to the highest of standards. He was trying to buy influence and Hillary was selling.
Guy tries to bribe a cop= Bad
Cop taking bribes = worse.
Here's the difference - there was absolutely no evidence of 'pay to play' on behalf of Clinton. None.
Someone returning an email is NOT evidence of buying influence. It's someone returning an email.
Clearly, Trump bribing the AG is a bright, clear line that leads directly to = Jail. He bribed a public official to stop an investigation of the fradulent Trump U. AND he used money from his foundation to do it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
