Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:31 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
They need a warrant for the specific things contained in that email unrelated to Weiner's investigation. It doesn't give them absolutely freedom to search anything they want in the laptop.
Thats not true at all if he handed over the laptop. its no different than opening the door and allowing police to search your house, with your permission, in your house.. you cant then go and tell them you agreed, but then changed your mind..

 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:31 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,730,943 times
Reputation: 15667
We will we hear the whining words about her being a female and not treated fairly.

Almost any women would have been a better choice. Maybe not experience but for sure on ethics, decency, honesty and integrity!

Obama had no experience so that shows the job doesn't require that type of experience but leadership and someone who knows how to run a company are way better than just because the person is a female!

One day a decent female will come along like Margaret Thatcher or Gold Meir and most people will be happy to have that type of woman lead this nation. Not Hilliary
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:32 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville View Post
Thank you for clarifying that.
It was completely wrong, especially from a legal standpoint..
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:36 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
Good response. Sums it up in 5 sentences.
If you dont mind being lied to..
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:43 AM
 
3,637 posts, read 1,697,364 times
Reputation: 5465
Nah, Hillary is a smart, tough woman. She never lets anything stop her from accomplishing her goals. That is what I like about her.
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:43 AM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,262,756 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
During her Florida rally, Clinton called upon Comey to release the information he has on her and her email controversies.


My first thought is, the woman who deleted the emails so nobody would find them, now demands disclosure after they are discovered?
Hillary, her surrogates, the Leftist Media & the CongressCritters are all "demanding" disclosure on the 10,000 emails found on the Abedine/Weiner Laptop in NY City.

Hillary & Bill are close to Loretta Lynch - TeamObama is out campaigning for Hillary & Loretta is part of that Team. They must KNOW exactly why Comey can't "disclose" what's on those emails.

Exclusive: FBI still does not have warrant to review new Abedin emails linked to Clinton probe |Yahoo News 10/29/16

When Comey got the file - he knew he had to have a warrant to look at the emails - Lynch said NO.
Let's remember please that the Comey investigation was predicated on a National Security Breach. This isn't "politics" - it's about National Security information that is (possibly) contained on a non-secure laptop in Anthony Weiner's possession - 10,000 emails.

The NY City investigation allowed a subpoena and warrant to seize the devices from Weiner - when they looked at this 10,000 email file .... they realized that it involved the National Security investigation in D.C.

None of them had the clearance to read/review the emails - even Director Comey does NOT have the Secret Clearance necessary to review what may be Highly Classified Government Secrets.

Loretta Lynch won't allow the Warrant -- that is very Serious Corruption.
Perhaps this is part of the reason that Comey refused to cover for her & told Congress he had new information. Director Comey testified under OATH to Congress about National Security, he took an OATH of Office to protect National Security - he is obligated to follow both OATH's.
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:50 AM
 
24,394 posts, read 23,050,809 times
Reputation: 14990
She's already frying her own brain cells trying to get rid of incriminating evidence. Here, Hillary, use the big hammer.
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,446,238 times
Reputation: 12318
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
We will we hear the whining words about her being a female and not treated fairly.

Almost any women would have been a better choice. Maybe not experience but for sure on ethics, decency, honesty and integrity!

Obama had no experience so that shows the job doesn't require that type of experience but leadership and someone who knows how to run a company are way better than just because the person is a female!

One day a decent female will come along like Margaret Thatcher or Gold Meir and most people will be happy to have that type of woman lead this nation. Not Hilliary
Obama had some experience . Just seems she had so much baggage but the powers that be thought she could be sold and shoved down the throats of the public . They think the average person is stupid and without the internet they would have been able to get away with it .

They might still be able to get away with it , many people already voted before this most recent FBI announcement.
It's just one too many things with Clinton and with the Clintons.
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:51 AM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,262,756 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1 View Post
Because investigators already read the emails. I do not believe the officers investigating Weiner saw the emails and stopped reading to immediately hand them to Comey. They were read. Just not by the FBI investigating HRC
They certainly read enough to know they did not have the Security Clearance to read any further.
This is a matter of National Security - that's why the 10,000 emails found on the Abedine/Weiner laptop in NY City were taken to Washington - even Comey doesn't have the Security Clearance high enough to review them.

Loretta Lynch will not allow a Warrant for the Intelligence Community to do the review or for Comey's investigators to read them. This is about National Security or they would not be in Washington - they would still be in NY City, where they DID have a Warrant.
 
Old 10-30-2016, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,629 posts, read 10,382,405 times
Reputation: 19517
Humagate is on the front page of every major paper and not a whiff of trending in any of the social media. Have the social media owners made the topic disappear and decided to cover for Ms. Clinton, again?

The corruption runs deep, Grasshopper.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top