Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think it will affect the election much, but it may indeed affect what comes after the election.
Or it could just be a bunch of nothing.
Won't even affect what happens after the election. The pope could have declared Clinton a saint and the republican congress would still hold another inquisition using thumb screws and cattle prods. They've publically said so, on record.
Who is this information going to move? How's this a surprise?
All this will do is make Trump supporters giddy and happy, and not move a single vote from Clinton to Trump. Clinton might lose few votes to third party candidates, but not to Trump.
That's fine. Vote third party. Just don't vote for a criminal conspirator.
Fun fact: a democrat has never been an FBI director.
Fun Fact, that isn't true.
First, FBI Director is a non-partisan post--you do not even need to make your party affiliation public.
Second FBI Director James B. Adams was a democratic legislator in Texas before becoming Director. There is no evidence that he changed is party affiliation before doing so. James Adams and William Sessions were also democrats.
But it doesn't look like they're going to resolve it in any way before the election - so what is the point? If it's nothing, he's essentially throwing the vote (not that I think this will make the electorate shift to Trump, he's that bad).
He needs to be more specific as to what is triggering the reopening of the investigation.
She IS guilty from the first batch.
She broke section (f) of the espionage act. She was extremely careless, reckless, etc... with the top secret information she DID have on her server. ALL of this is admitted by the FBI, he even said she broke the law, but that she didn't "intend" to. Problem is... INTENT is not an element of section (f).
So, she is GUILTY and should not be running for office.
The point is, they should have arrested her before we got this far.
Hillary is talking now about making history which is dumb. I could care less about making history. She is corrupt and I don't want a corrupt woman who will continue to abuse her power in the WH.
There's always impeachment if anything of substance ever comes out of these endless witch hunts. I the meantime, we have a competent, experienced commander in chief in the oval office.
That's how they handled the original case of the emails in that details weren't released. Any case for that matter, certain details aren't released. So what you're looking for won't be known I'm guessing for quite some time until the investigation is over and I'd be shocked if it is known before election day.
I think we can say this.....this doesn't look good at all for clinton and I'm guessing what they have is not pretty to open this up so close to election day.
I'm thinking the establishment is getting very afraid she won't win, and she no longer has their protection, but in that case, who would run, or, would Obama stay in? Isn't there some kind of clause in the constitution that talks about something like this which opens it up to Obama?
No. I suppose Kaine would inherit her votes.
Or maybe not. It is 'odd' they do this after 25% of the votes have already been cast.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
