Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:27 PM
 
13,422 posts, read 9,952,903 times
Reputation: 14357

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Financialguy View Post
Once again, for those in denial. This from noted right winger, Carl Bernstein:

Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was "A Real Bombshell" | Video | RealClearPolitics
In that case, he owes it to the electorate to tell us what this bombshell is. I'm being quite serious. And if you're a Trump supporter, and you think it's going to sink her, then you should want that too.

 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:28 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,250,426 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by bxlover View Post
This turned out to not be as bad as the headlines.
How do you know? We don't know anything yet.
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:29 PM
 
4,587 posts, read 2,598,716 times
Reputation: 2349
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
How do you know? We don't know anything yet.
True but its not a reopening of anything as the OP stated.
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:29 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,250,426 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
So - you inform Congress that there is, for want of a better word, an addendum to the investigation, but you don't inform the person being "investigated"?

What's up with that?
Is that the normal procedure? To inform the person being investigated first?
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Secure, Undisclosed
1,984 posts, read 1,700,609 times
Reputation: 3728
Did anyone else notice how stage-managed she - and the presser - was? She relegated the selection of the journalist to a staffer (who allowed only three questions) and she directly answered only the first one. She also looked as uncomfortable as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.

She reiterated basically the same paper statement that Podesta released earlier in the day and stuck to it like glue. When a question asked something beyond that paper statement, she simply pivoted back to it - and didn't answer the question.

If she becomes president, will her staff manager her administration the same way? (Obama's did...)

Hmmmmm....
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:29 PM
 
1,327 posts, read 723,075 times
Reputation: 700
Except Trump is a great candidate and will make a great president.
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:30 PM
 
13,422 posts, read 9,952,903 times
Reputation: 14357
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
Is that the normal procedure? To inform the person being investigated first?
Did I say first?

I do find it quite odd, yes. Especially under these circumstances.
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:30 PM
 
1,327 posts, read 723,075 times
Reputation: 700
Doc, the criminal under investigation is never notified of the investigation until the arrest warrant comes down. Now, of course, in Clinton's case in the sewer that is DC, who knows.
 
Old 10-28-2016, 05:30 PM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
Just announced on the news. Comey sent a letter to Congress that there appears to be more classified docs in emails. I'll post a link when the print media catches up.
Sadly, you have been misinformed by your sources.

Comey doesn't even know what's in the emails, whether anything classified will show up, or even if they are significant at all.

But he can't wait to get the "news" out.

"Mr. Comey said the F.B.I. was taking steps to “determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.” He said he did not know how long it would take to review the emails, or whether the new information was significant."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us...mail.html?_r=0
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top