Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:39 PM
 
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
16,391 posts, read 30,950,949 times
Reputation: 16645

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Statz2k10 View Post
Popular vote is stupid. As long as the electoral college decides the election so many people know there votes are useless if they live in a particular state. If you're Democrat you probably aren't too excited about voting in Texas. Same for a Republican in California. So it's not exactly accurate outlook.
To a point, but look at Michigan this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:40 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,300 posts, read 7,339,094 times
Reputation: 10113
I always think it's funny how people bring up the popular vote win or loss when their candidate loses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:41 PM
 
27,668 posts, read 16,160,831 times
Reputation: 19097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Do you not understand what the popular vote is? Wow, I can't believe Trump supporters. Not a clue.
You wouldnt understand unless you were following a thread yesterday... No clue:cry ing::cryin g:Need a hankie?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:43 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,300 posts, read 7,339,094 times
Reputation: 10113
People always cry about the electoral system when it doesn't work out for them just like when Bush won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:45 PM
 
5,126 posts, read 7,416,287 times
Reputation: 8396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittgenstein's Ghost View Post

This is obviously irrelevant to the outcome of the election, but it is very relevant to our discussion on this forum. Clinton looks likely to win the popular vote. Thus, Donald Trump didn't actually convince more people to support him than Clinton did (if the popular vote projection holds). Granted, he motivated a large portion of the country, but the narrative that Clinton had less support than Trump is simply false.
Oops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:47 PM
 
5,849 posts, read 4,186,924 times
Reputation: 7683
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
I always think it's funny how people bring up the popular vote win or loss when their candidate loses.
Always? How many times do you think this has happened?

To be clear, I'm in no way arguing that Trump's victory (assuming he wins the EC) is any less legitimate. I am simply making a claim about the conclusions we as spectators are drawing from this election. The fact that HRC may in fact get more votes is relevant to our discussion about the election dynamics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:48 PM
 
5,849 posts, read 4,186,924 times
Reputation: 7683
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
People always cry about the electoral system when it doesn't work out for them just like when Bush won.
Who is crying about the electoral system? Did you actually read my post?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shooting Stars View Post
Oops.
What?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:52 PM
 
5,849 posts, read 4,186,924 times
Reputation: 7683
Trump is likely looking at the lowest percentage of support for any winning President since 1992 (Bill Clinton), and that was a peculiar election with a major third-party candidate (Perot). My point is simply that we shouldn't conclude too much about Trump having an incredibly high amount of support. My guess is that probably 20-25% of the country would describe themselves as serious Trump supporters. The next 20-25% would describe themselves as either Republicans who view him as the lesser of two evils or independents who hate Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:55 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,300 posts, read 7,339,094 times
Reputation: 10113
What does that mean he really didn't win because he didn't win by a landslide? Polls said he was going to lose by a large margin just shows you how wrong most polls were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:56 PM
 
1,327 posts, read 723,784 times
Reputation: 700
No, she won't. We tried to warn you people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top