Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2016, 11:57 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,301 posts, read 7,339,094 times
Reputation: 10117

Advertisements

The fact is still she may not even win the popular vote either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2016, 12:16 AM
 
3,811 posts, read 4,699,075 times
Reputation: 3330
Quote:
Originally Posted by burgler09 View Post
To a point, but look at Michigan this year.
You're right BUT...we are talking about California here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2016, 12:22 AM
 
5,855 posts, read 4,186,924 times
Reputation: 7683
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
What does that mean he really didn't win because he didn't win by a landslide? Polls said he was going to lose by a large margin just shows you how wrong most polls were.
No, in fact I said the exact opposite: winning the popular vote has nothing to do with winning the election.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
The fact is still she may not even win the popular vote either.
She may not. But she has a very good chance of doing so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Financialguy View Post
No, she won't. We tried to warn you people.
How on earth do you know that? She is winning California by 25% and only 42% of the state has reported.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2016, 12:23 AM
 
5,855 posts, read 4,186,924 times
Reputation: 7683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statz2k10 View Post
You're right BUT...we are talking about California here.
California just comes last because it's on Pacific time. That doesn't invalidate its contribution to the popular vote any more than Texas' or Mississippi's does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2016, 12:29 AM
 
3,811 posts, read 4,699,075 times
Reputation: 3330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittgenstein's Ghost View Post
California just comes last because it's on Pacific time. That doesn't invalidate its contribution to the popular vote any more than Texas' or Mississippi's does.
Yes it does. When was the last time California went RED? 1988? If you live in California chances are your vote is pointless especially when you see a guy like Trump running for President.

Same goes for Liberals in Texas or the Dakotas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top