Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2016, 02:03 AM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,143 posts, read 5,811,006 times
Reputation: 7711

Advertisements

Did these seventeen agencies do their own independent investigation?
Or is it like when you Google a story and you get seventeen links that
all link back to the same source?

Why do we have seventeen intelligence agencies anyway?
Does that sound efficient to anyone? I wonder how well they interact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2016, 02:46 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,635,445 times
Reputation: 12560
Comey should be fired for his part. Obama appointed him even though he was a Republican. Obama should have known better. I mean who's side do you think he will take? Hello?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 02:48 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,664,682 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Here you go:
Air Force Intelligence
Department of the Treasury
Army Intelligence
Drug Enforcement Administration
Central Intelligence Agency
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Coast Guard Intelligence
Marine Corps Intelligence
Defense Intelligence Agency
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Department of Energy
National Reconnaissance Office
Department of Homeland Security
National Security Agency
Department of State
Navy Intelligence

That help?

I do wonder though...most make sense...but the dept of treasury?

So it's your claim that all 16 of these agencies, started their own independent investigation, of a privately owned server? LOL! Maybe you guys should listen to yourselves.
  • It's either complete nonsense.
Or
  • A prime example of how dysfunctional the government has become under Obama's leadership.
Your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 05:00 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,743,089 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrviking View Post
I keep hearing that the Russians "hacked". the election from the main stream media. Perhaps someone can help me find the devastating news that was discovered that tilted the election to Trump. Still Looking!
Here's the best breakdown I've seen so far: https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/...ts-not-enough/

Small part of that:
Quote:
It must be stated plainly: The U.S. intelligence community must make its evidence against Russia public if they want us to believe their claims. The integrity of our presidential elections is vital to the country’s survival; blind trust in the CIA is not. A governmental disclosure like this is also not entirely without precedent: In 2014, the Department of Justice produced a 56-page indictment detailing their exact evidence against a team of Chinese hackers working for the People’s Liberation Army, accused of stealing American trade secrets; each member was accused by name. The 2014 trade secret theft was a crime of much lower magnitude than election meddling, but what the DOJ furnished is what we should demand today from our country’s spies.
Underlying problem is that the timing is far too convenient. Russians hacked us, but this wasn't all that important to scream furiously from the rooftops until right now, when Donald Trump is a lock to take office. Now would be the last window of opportunity to sabotage Trump's presidency, so now is the time that dirty tricks tend to come out. People don't believe the whole, "The Russians Stole My Election!!" schpeel because it just feels like more excuses for Hillary losing and the timing tends to point at this being a false flag operation and/or more Democrat propaganda.

Last edited by godofthunder9010; 12-22-2016 at 05:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Southern Nevada
6,753 posts, read 3,375,736 times
Reputation: 10376
Russia, Iran, North Korea, China ..... all of them and maybe others have been hacking the U.S. for years. Obama knew it long before he came out with the accusations just before the election. It was a weak attempt to salvage what what left of Clinton's campaign which at that point, was swirling in the bowl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 05:19 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,682,616 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Russian hacking is no longer a question, it is a proven fact. CIA, FBI, other intelligence agencies, independent private sector computer network experts all agree the Russians did in fact break into the DNC's computer, stole the private data and gave it to WikiLeaks.

The WikiLeaks was not the primary reason Clinton lost. It was one factor out of many. The single largest factor was Comey's letter -- there was an immediate drop in her poll numbers after that letter was released from which she never recovered.
I also think the FBI interference was the biggest reason. It is hard to estimate how many voters the Russian pro-Trump interference was able to sway. Hacking was only one part of it. On-line presence, and fake news were also heavily utilized to promote Trump, and tear down the opponent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 05:50 AM
 
5,472 posts, read 3,229,454 times
Reputation: 3935
America needs to fix its computer systems. A start would be to build computer in America !!! There should be a defined and select Federal and State INTRANET, that is not connected to the INTERNET !!! If we don't figure out how to have a dual system and ensure that there are hard locks between them, then we invite continued waste of money and lay open to higher risk.

We play budget cheap games and then complain when we are hacked, yet, these foreign nation employ mass numbers of people to engage in their Cyber Security, we want to put skeleton crews and then whine we are hacked.

Everyone knows Russia hacked the system, the political spin game of denial is itself insidious. We had better call it what it is, and stand on the call, and be driven to fix the leak in the dikes. We go blind and can't figure out we've been hacked till long after the fact. What good does that do? We better wake up and get up to date in our system and get busy and build a parallel system, that is not internet accessible.

There should have long been a dual system, and for portals that deal with state and local agencies, that should have been a system, with hard locks that lock on the internet, when they want to interact with Intranet servers.
There should have been a SPECIFIC browser designed for specific access to INTRANET, and the instance that browsers is deployed, the Internet is Locked Out.
What are we using common open market browsers for in the first place when it comes to government data interactions.

We could have our own "gatekeeper network of people" to ensure these is no compromise between a specific government brower and a public web browser. If we had specific dumps managed by "gatekeepers" to serves where data can be filtered for public service program operators to access, then there would be no pathway into the areas or servers where secret and critical information is kept.

We need to review and redesign the infrastructure. If we don't make investments to separate such things, and have a secure intranet for our grid and everything else that is critical, and designated access to that system via special browsers and managed by specific gate keepers, then we will spin in the cycle of data breeches continually. We've been at this for well more than 30 yrs, one would think, some of these things would be well underway.

How do we allow- system to not have some intricate protocols that alert when a string has set off a scan process, surely we can do it, if the public browsers providers have "bots" that go in and collect and target anything they want to target about the public.

There's a lot of smart people who know this stuff, but someone is holding the purse strings and not making it a priority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 06:14 AM
 
2,752 posts, read 2,591,125 times
Reputation: 4046
Wow, we have gone six pages of yes they did or not they didn't, perhaps someone else did. REGARDLESS who might of hacked who. I am trying to find out what INFORMATION or NEWS was put into play before the election because of the hack, that pushed people to vote TRUMP. What damaging information was possibly put out that caused Clinton to lose. ??? All I hear over and over is that the Russians hacked the election, yada yada yada. If nothing damaging was put out about Clinton why would anyone care enough to vote trump?.
YOU could almost say that it helped Clinton. If voters thought that the Russians were trying to hurt her with the hacking then she might of benefited with the sympathy vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 06:26 AM
 
1,160 posts, read 714,002 times
Reputation: 1346
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrviking View Post
Wow, we have gone six pages of yes they did or not they didn't, perhaps someone else did. REGARDLESS who might of hacked who. I am trying to find out what INFORMATION or NEWS was put into play before the election because of the hack, that pushed people to vote TRUMP. What damaging information was possibly put out that caused Clinton to lose. ??? All I hear over and over is that the Russians hacked the election, yada yada yada. If nothing damaging was put out about Clinton why would anyone care enough to vote trump?.
YOU could almost say that it helped Clinton. If voters thought that the Russians were trying to hurt her with the hacking then she might of benefited with the sympathy vote.
People outside of a few major metro areas DID NOT LIKE HILLARY and/or Donkey policies.

Trump was more appealing than Hillary to the voters in the majority of precincts, counties, and states. its as simple as that - Hillary was a terrible candidate who had "weird spells" on camera and was subject to several investigations due to her mishandling of classified information. She was terrible and she lost the popular vote in the majority of states (which is the only place popular vote counts)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,743,089 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrviking View Post
Wow, we have gone six pages of yes they did or not they didn't, perhaps someone else did. REGARDLESS who might of hacked who. I am trying to find out what INFORMATION or NEWS was put into play before the election because of the hack, that pushed people to vote TRUMP. What damaging information was possibly put out that caused Clinton to lose. ??? All I hear over and over is that the Russians hacked the election, yada yada yada. If nothing damaging was put out about Clinton why would anyone care enough to vote trump?.
YOU could almost say that it helped Clinton. If voters thought that the Russians were trying to hurt her with the hacking then she might of benefited with the sympathy vote.
Honest truth: The Democrats desperately want a super simple answer for why they lost. Russian hackers is a nice and simple go-to answer. Racism, misogyny, bigotry, Islamophobia are all also quick and easy answers. But everyone knew about all of that stuff (imagined or real) before the election and America elected Trump anyways. The quick and dirty answers are the wrong answers. The DNC needs to shut up, cut the crap, roll up their sleeves and do the hard work of figuring out why they actually lost.

The Russian hacking -- if it even was Russians -- was not why Hillary lost. Hillary Clinton is the reason that Hillary Clinton lost. If the time comes that we know with 100% certainty that it was the Russians, it really doesn't matter. The American people already knew it probably was Russians on November 8th and weighed that in their decision of who to vote for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top