Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2008, 03:15 AM
 
240 posts, read 475,200 times
Reputation: 252

Advertisements

The Clinton Campaign's post March 4th message is to forget about the delegate count and nominate Hillary because she can win the big states Democrats need in November. That argument simply doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Here's why:

[Mod edited for copyright: Please use no more than two sentences and a link.]

Robert Creamer: Clinton's "Big State" Myth: Why Barack Obama Remains the Most Electable Democrat This Fall - Politics on The Huffington Post

Last edited by TnHilltopper; 03-06-2008 at 06:42 PM.. Reason: copyright
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2008, 04:01 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Awesome Article...really verbalizes what many of us already are thinking.

However,
One pivotal group I see Obama risks losing is Hispanics. She's been whalloping him there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 04:54 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,766,887 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliptik View Post
The Clinton Campaign's post March 4th message is to forget about the delegate count and nominate Hillary because she can win the big states Democrats need in November. That argument simply doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Here's why:

[Mod edited for content]

Robert Creamer: Clinton's "Big State" Myth: Why Barack Obama Remains the Most Electable Democrat This Fall - Politics on The Huffington Post
Me thinks that ALL The Democrats give Ohio too much money, time and attention. They would do better to battle for other states too. John Kerry put all his eggs in Ohio and none of them hatched!

Last edited by TnHilltopper; 03-06-2008 at 06:43 PM.. Reason: Orphaned content
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 04:58 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
^great point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 06:02 AM
 
Location: Downtown Greensboro, NC
3,491 posts, read 8,582,814 times
Reputation: 631
You really hit the head on the nail with your article.......Hillary does make the case about winning the big states but all of the big states that she has won, with exception to Texas are heavily blue states and would vote for Obama regardless in the general election. You can also forget about Texas going blue in the general election. Obama has made head way in red states which could turn blue if he were the nominee. All it takes is a few red states turning blue and Obama wins the presidency. Independents as I said before would put Obama over the top. Hillary supporters just dont see it that way and would rather lose supporting Hillary than win supporting Obama. You can bet the republicans will rally their party together to "stop Hillary" and thats not a good sign. Believe it or not, a "stop Hillary" campaign has already started
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 06:13 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,916,363 times
Reputation: 4459
if the democrats think they can win the election without ohio, florida, and michigan they could be mistaken....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 06:32 AM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,432,712 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
The one thing that could energize the Republican base is their inveterate hatred for Hillary Clinton. Clinton would mobilize right-wing base voters the same way that hatred for Bush motivated Democrats in 2006. Why should we help galvanize the Republican base by nominating Hillary Clinton when we have another great choice?

The above quote really nailed it for me, in fact the whole article really tells it like it is. Makes points that several of us have been trying to get across, but Clinton supporters just ignore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Downtown Greensboro, NC
3,491 posts, read 8,582,814 times
Reputation: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
if the democrats think they can win the election without ohio, florida, and michigan they could be mistaken....
If im not mistaken John Kerry won all those states in the primary but he lost them all in the general election. Hillary's big state win claim just doesnt hold up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 02:41 PM
 
939 posts, read 2,380,826 times
Reputation: 568
Glad you posted this. Also, if one takes into account the six states with the most delegates that have held primaries so far (TX, OH, CA, NY, NJ, IL), of the 1,196 delegates at stake, Senator Clinton took only 56 more total than Obama, with 10 in Texas and 2 in OH still outstanding (according to Real Clear Politics data).

If you look at only NY, NJ, IL and CA, as the author says, the traditional "solid" blue states, with a total of 862 delegates, there's a difference of 46 delegates (Obama 408 and Clinton 454). Those states going to McCain if Obama is the nominee is highly unlikely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2008, 02:52 PM
 
88 posts, read 408,141 times
Reputation: 24
Well Im a culturally conservative republican, and most of my friends are too. Many of them no longer view Hillary as bad as they used to, in fact many of them think Obama is worse. I think that while the Washington Elite may love to disparage Hillary, nomnating Obama would probably energize the base.

Im about as right wing as you could get, but I would much rather vote for Hillary than Obama. Obama's record is much more liberal than Hillary's.

I think the republican elite have picked the wrong person to villify.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top