Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:35 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,602,626 times
Reputation: 25817

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus Clay Banger View Post
Liberal Anti-Trump Narrative DESTROYED:



So much for the "poor, uneducated, backwoods hicks living on welfare and voting against their own self-interests" meme being bandied about by Democrats!

Losers losing again!

Here's some advice: Looking down your nose at your fellow Americans is not a viable political strategy. Especially since you folks don't even seem to know anything about those Americans.

Country Folk Aren
Well, then I would say that makes race a HUGE issue in this campaign. Trump campaigned on the wall, deporting brown people, and slapping down those lazy blacks all on welfare.

Mission accomplished.

Let's discuss no further the economic angst of the white working class. It WAS all about race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2017, 09:49 AM
 
833 posts, read 523,302 times
Reputation: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Well, then I would say that makes race a HUGE issue in this campaign. Trump campaigned on the wall, deporting brown people, and slapping down those lazy blacks all on welfare.

Mission accomplished.

Let's discuss no further the economic angst of the white working class. It WAS all about race.
Your command of statistics is abysmal. Higher income no more speaks to racism then racism speaks to higher incomes. People can be legitimately worried about their source of income - good income or bad income - without even thinking about race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 09:53 AM
 
833 posts, read 523,302 times
Reputation: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
As per CNN National Exit Poll:

College educated white women supported Clinton over Trump by 51% to 44%, while white non-college women supported Trump by 27% (61% to 34%).

Trump carried white college men by 14% (53% to 39%).

Trump carried total white college grads by 3% (48% to 45%). By contrast, Trump carried white non-college voters by 37% (66% to 29%).

Exit Polls 2016

Not sure where your getting your data.
You completely missed the point. Hillary was supposed to be the person who drew in women. Hillary was supposed to draw in the college educated. The FACT is that Hillary barely won the white college educated women vote....something she should have ran away with.....which means that Trump had far more appeal to college educated women then ever could have been imagined. A dinky 6 percent is nothing. Trump carried the white college educated vote......which in itself destroys the leftist narrative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 01:35 PM
 
11,986 posts, read 5,321,453 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus Clay Banger View Post
You completely missed the point. Hillary was supposed to be the person who drew in women. Hillary was supposed to draw in the college educated. The FACT is that Hillary barely won the white college educated women vote....something she should have ran away with.....which means that Trump had far more appeal to college educated women then ever could have been imagined. A dinky 6 percent is nothing. Trump carried the white college educated vote......which in itself destroys the leftist narrative.
I didn't miss the point. You stated something that was factually incorrect, was called on it, and now you're unsuccessfully trying to cover your a**. Fact check before you post something if you don't like being corrected.

Also,

"Have ran"

Seriously?

And it's 7 points (51-44 =7) not 6, so your math skills are as bad as your grammar.

In the words of your hero.

"Sad"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 01:43 PM
 
17,406 posts, read 12,015,750 times
Reputation: 16178
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Why is every white supremacist on the side of the GOP?
Byrd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 02:16 PM
 
833 posts, read 523,302 times
Reputation: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
I didn't miss the point. You stated something that was factually incorrect, was called on it, and now you're unsuccessfully trying to cover your a**. Fact check before you post something if you don't like being corrected.

Also,

"Have ran"

Seriously?

And it's 7 points (51-44 =7) not 6, so your math skills are as bad as your grammar.

In the words of your hero.

"Sad"
This, folks, is what liberalism has been reduced to. I'm not surprised that they are still wondering why they lost the election. They dither with nothingness while the Trump Train rolls on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 02:24 PM
 
11,986 posts, read 5,321,453 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus Clay Banger View Post
This, folks, is what liberalism has been reduced to. I'm not surprised that they are still wondering why they lost the election. They dither with nothingness while the Trump Train rolls on.
And this, folks, is your typical Trump apologist.

They never admit it when they post something that's incorrect. They deflect, and obfuscate, just like their hero.

They claim that the stereotypes of Trump voters are incorrect, while at the same time their own language usage undercuts their own arguments.

Last edited by Bureaucat; 04-10-2017 at 02:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 07:50 PM
 
1,711 posts, read 1,906,815 times
Reputation: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
I didn't miss the point. You stated something that was factually incorrect, was called on it, and now you're unsuccessfully trying to cover your a**. Fact check before you post something if you don't like being corrected.
Your grammar is incorrect too. "You... was called on it..."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2017, 07:02 AM
 
11,986 posts, read 5,321,453 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thy Kingdom Come View Post
Your grammar is incorrect too. "You... was called on it..."
Got me on that one.

Touché
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2017, 07:21 PM
 
4,299 posts, read 2,820,489 times
Reputation: 2132
This doesn't surprise me. It shows why they don't care about minorities because they are too privileged.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatDJohns View Post
Poor people did not vote in Trump, white people did. The only 2 white demographics that did not go for Trump were Jewish Americans and LGBT Americans.
Some of us with a disability did not vote for him either.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokinouta View Post
Why? Just curious why you voted for Hilary. What did she want to give the common man?

If you make to much for welfare and not enough to afford living expenses then what programs drew you to vote for her? Do you work in jobs that compete with illegal labor? Do you work in jobs that support our energy sector? Construction? Trades? Infrastructure? What were you getting from that vote?

I voted for Bernie at first but as the common man/woman couldn't really vote for Hilary. Her free borders, welfare program, NAFTA supporting speeches would not make for a smooth ride. It would just be more of the same, which hasn't been great. So I'm curious, why did you vote for her? Was it policy based or just the personal side of things?
The person didn't say they voted for Hilary. However, any person even the common man should be concerned about Trump so the right choice would be to vote against him because he is the most unfit candidate we have ever had. This goes beyond politics. He never should have been able to run in the first place. If you don't see the danger to him being president you are at best naive.

Last edited by Nickchick; 04-12-2017 at 07:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top