Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You take away from your own statements (as week and presumptive as they are) when you name call.
Ha! Your statement is too true!
And the appropriate response to the first rant would be:
It's great that Hillary doesn't have to have a black vice-president. Now she can pick whatever color she so desires (because every woman likes to pick whatever colors she thinks will look best).
Bill Richardson Endorses Obama - Bill Richardson[SIZE=-1]It isn't official yet, but Bill Richardson's comments yesterday all but confirm that the former candidate and still-current Governor will endorse Obama.[/SIZE]
What's really sad is that he is a superdelegate and everyone seems to think that superdelegates should vote WITH their state -- and his state went for Clinton --
Sooooo??????!!!!! Now he would say he is for Obama even though he should vote for Clinton? Or are Obama supporters going to GET REAL!!
"Richardson deferred from announcing a personal endorsement of either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama (“I’m legitimately torn," between the two, he said), but suggested that the leader after this week's primaries will have the presumptive title."
he s saying the person with most delegate and more popular vote after super tuesday II is the winner:OBAMA
Oh, so you're NOT saying he's endorsed Obama anymore, huh? What clued you in -- the sentence that says Richardson has not endorsed anyone and says he's legitimately torn between the two?
Look at the date -- this was before the Tuesday results. NO ONE is saying Obama is the winner anymore; well, except the Obama people.
Fitting that this incredible man far the superior to low class Hillary has made it clear that he doesn't intend on being a VP. Very smart. Why should he lower himself to be part of a ticket headed by that pathetic Hillary?
It was Hillary's tactic to say that she would have Obama on her ticket, NOT because she felt Obama was the right running mate for her after careful consideration and deliberation, BUT BECAUSE SUCH A STATEMENT MIGHT GET HER MORE VOTES. What trash.
Barack put a stop to that and notice that he hasn't said that he would put Hillary on the ticket. Why? Because he's winning and he's going to win the nomination. He doesn't need that Clinton to bring down the quality of his ticket. Smart.
What's irritatingly shameful is how the media is completely on board with this little stunt. Even worse, they can't seem to bring themselves to report what Barack has said.
What we're witnessing, Alexus, is an "oh crap" moment by the MSM. They were so busy patting Barack on the head, that they didn't see him outrunning the Clintons--and them.
Never let it be said that we still have to work 3 times as hard, in order to be considered twice as good.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
