Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2017, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,821,377 times
Reputation: 49248

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by woxyroxme View Post
I have always thought that Anderson kept anti-Reagan republicans from voting for Carter and that is how Reagan won.
That is something that could be debated: yes, he offered an alternative to Reagan but if he hadn't been a candidate do you really think those Republicans would have voted for Carter? None of us will ever know. My thoughts, just from the ones I knew and living in CA they were more than a few, they would all have voted for Reagan over Carter. They knew Anderson would not win, and they would never have supported Carter.Plus check the % Reagan won by, even if 50% of those who voted for Anderson had voted for Carter or 75% Reagan would still have won. That is like saying Perot costs Bush the election. He hurt him, but not enough to cost him the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2017, 09:58 PM
 
16,624 posts, read 8,636,025 times
Reputation: 19451
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxmanSneaks View Post
Do you think Carter would have been re-elected if the hostages were released before the election? Or Would he still have lost the election.
Carter had no chance, just like Ford had no chance.
McCain also had no chance, so 2008 was Hillary's best shot if she had not been beaten by an unheard of political neophyte named Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2017, 10:03 PM
 
16,624 posts, read 8,636,025 times
Reputation: 19451
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
That is something that could be debated: yes, he offered an alternative to Reagan but if he hadn't been a candidate do you really think those Republicans would have voted for Carter? None of us will ever know. My thoughts, just from the ones I knew and living in CA they were more than a few, they would all have voted for Reagan over Carter. They knew Anderson would not win, and they would never have supported Carter.Plus check the % Reagan won by, even if 50% of those who voted for Anderson had voted for Carter or 75% Reagan would still have won. That is like saying Perot costs Bush the election. He hurt him, but not enough to cost him the election.
I agreed with all you said until you made the mistake of including Perot in your comment. I know many of my Dads friends who voted for Perot not because they disliked Bush, rather because Republicans/conservatives expect politicians to stay true to their word. Bush vowed and promised not to raise taxes, yet at a certain point felt it was best to do so for the country. As a result he lost a lot of people who either didn't vote, or figured they would give a straight talking Perot a shot.
Rest assured if it was a two way race between Bill Clinton and the incumbent Bush, Bush would have won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 09:03 AM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,593,179 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxmanSneaks View Post
Do you think Carter would have been re-elected if the hostages were released before the election? Or Would he still have lost the election.
While some elections involving an incumbent POTUS were landslides (FDR, Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan), many of them were extremely close calls. For most of the close elections you could pick out one issue that may have determined the outcome.

Incumbent Presidents who lost a re-election vote
  1. John Adams 1,460 2 Served one full term. Lost reelection.
  2. John Quincy Adams 1,461 6 Served one full term. Lost reelection.
  3. Martin Van Buren 1,461 8 Served one full term. Lost reelection (twice).
  4. Benjamin Harrison 1,461 23 Served one full term. Lost reelection.
  5. William Howard Taft 1,461 27 Served one full term. Lost reelection.
  6. Herbert Hoover 1,461 31 Served one full term. Lost reelection.
  7. Gerald Ford 895 38 Served the remaining 2 years, 5 months, and 11 days of Nixon's second term. Lost election for a full term.
  8. Jimmy Carter 1,461 39 Served one full term. Lost reelection.
  9. George H. W. Bush 1,461 41 Served one full term. Lost reelection.

Incumbent Presidents who were not nominated for re-election or withdrew
  1. John Tyler 1,430 10 Served the remaining 3 years and 11 months of William H. Harrison's term. Lost nomination for a full term.
  2. James K. Polk 1,461 11 Served one full term. Did not seek a second term.
  3. Franklin Pierce 1,461 14 Served one full term. Lost renomination.
  4. James Buchanan 1,461 15 Served one full term. Did not seek a second term.
  5. Andrew Johnson 1,419 17 Served the remaining 3 years, 10 months, and 17 days of Lincoln's second term. Lost nomination for a full term.
  6. Rutherford B. Hayes 1,461 19 Served one full term. Did not seek a second term.
  7. Chester A. Arthur 1,262 21 Served the remaining 3 years, 5 months, and 13 days of Garfield's term. Lost nomination for a full term.
  8. Lyndon B. Johnson 1,886 36 Served the remaining 1 year, 1 month, and 29 days of Kennedy's term. Served a full term. Withdrew from the race for renomination.

One Incumbent President who failed to be nominated for re-election and four years later lost an election
  1. Millard Fillmore 969 13 Served the remaining 2 years, 7 months, and 23 days of Taylor's term. Lost nomination for a full term in 1852. Lost election in 1856.

Incumbent Presidents who were re-elected (days in office)
  1. George Washington 2,865
  2. Thomas Jefferson 2,922
  3. James Madison 2,922
  4. James Monroe 2,922
  5. Andrew Jackson 2,922
  6. Abraham Lincoln 1,503
  7. Ulysses S. Grant 2,922
  8. Grover Cleveland 2,922
  9. William McKinley 1,654
  10. Theodore Roosevelt 2,728
  11. Calvin Coolidge 2,041
  12. Woodrow Wilson 2,922
  13. Franklin D. Roosevelt 4,422
  14. Harry S. Truman 2,840
  15. Dwight D. Eisenhower 2,922
  16. Lyndon B. Johnson 1,886
  17. Richard Nixon 2,027
  18. Ronald Reagan 2,922
  19. Bill Clinton 2,922
  20. George W. Bush 2,922
  21. Barack Obama 2,922

Four Presidents died in office, and Donald Trump has not completed first term. Grover Cleveland was both POTUS #22 and #24. The statistics add up to 45 presidents.

Last edited by PacoMartin; 06-19-2017 at 09:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Formerly New England now Texas!
1,708 posts, read 1,101,146 times
Reputation: 1562
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxmanSneaks View Post
Do you think Carter would have been re-elected if the hostages were released before the election? Or Would he still have lost the election.
No, credit card interest rates were nearly 30%, we had stagflation, home mortgages were going from 11 to 16%. The economy did Carter in, as did the oil boycott, Iran was just icing on the cake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 07:43 PM
 
17,349 posts, read 11,305,123 times
Reputation: 41030
No, he was going to lose regardless of the hostages. Interest rates were extremely high as well as inflation. The economy was really bad. People were tired of him because the economy was getting worse instead of better. The hostages were just one more nail in his political coffin.
Reagan gave people hope. Carter didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 07:54 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,237,135 times
Reputation: 18824
Carter would've likely still lost. There was so much other stuff going on that wasn't in his favor. Reagan represented a fresh start for a new decade. Plus, the Republicans were back to their old '68 tricks, but doing it in a more subtle fashion. It was all about perpetuating the idea of the welfare queen, and making veiled appeals to the white working class that they were losing their country. Reagan's guys were all top notch political operatives. They knew what they were doing.

Carter, for all of his sunny optimism and political honesty, just didn't go over well coming out of the Vietnam Era. The country was in shambles, Watergate still lingered, the hostage crisis dragged on for far too long, inflation was outta control, unemployment was a bit high, and Reagan represented law, order, competence, strength, and a return to the America that people missed.

So really, I don't see any chance of a Carter victory. That's how I remember feeling at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,821,377 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
I agreed with all you said until you made the mistake of including Perot in your comment. I know many of my Dads friends who voted for Perot not because they disliked Bush, rather because Republicans/conservatives expect politicians to stay true to their word. Bush vowed and promised not to raise taxes, yet at a certain point felt it was best to do so for the country. As a result he lost a lot of people who either didn't vote, or figured they would give a straight talking Perot a shot.
Rest assured if it was a two way race between Bill Clinton and the incumbent Bush, Bush would have won.
I still don't know if he would have won, but I guess we will never know. There is no doubt Perot did hurt him badly My dad and step mom were 2 of those who supported Perot. I was shocked, I ever thought I would see the day my dad didn't vote Republican in a national election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,630,065 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxmanSneaks View Post
Do you think Carter would have been re-elected if the hostages were released before the election? Or Would he still have lost the election.
I honestly think that Ted Kennedy primary-ing him had more to do with his loss in 80 than the hostage situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 08:35 AM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,106,472 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
I honestly think that Ted Kennedy primary-ing him had more to do with his loss in 80 than the hostage situation.
And then there was the story about Carter being attacked by the "killer rabbit". Political cartoonists at the time depicted the rabbit as bearing a strong resemblance to Ted Kennedy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top