Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
More like those who have been programmed by Fox News and talk radio to hate Clinton would be fuming and hoarding guns. Never mind that Trump has said things far more threatening to the 2nd amendment than Clinton ever has.
Not to mention the anti-2A provisions in the budget that the GOP overwhelmingly passed.
Moderates might be happier- but not necessarily liberals. Hillary would be President if she had actually turned out the liberal and minority votes at the same rate as other Democrats.
In some ways this is a liberal dream- the Democratic party is finally done with the Clintons, the Republicans are growing less popular by the day and a lot of left leaning folks are quitting with the purity & hand wringing to become involved. It is similar to when some pundits said Bill Clinton was the real architect of the R resurgence in the 90s.
Love her or hate her, she has experience and would have appointed a lot of better people. No doubt about that.
But fate is fickle so we have no idea how things would turn out. My spidey sense tells me the GOP and "forgotten man" and "uneducated" electorate who elected Trump (by minority) would be yelling and screaming so loud that the Government would be somewhat paralyzed.
Still, in the end, at least we'd have a functioning Dept. of State and many other things...and I wouldn't be worrying about nukes possibly going off. I somewhat doubt Hillary would have increased the debt 1.5 Trillion when things were almost balanced and I KNOW she would not have thrown 10 million people off the health care rolls. Lots of other similar things add up to a more logical POTUS reign.
But - you never know. Sometimes things have to get REALLY bad for the electorate to improve their education...in the case of the USA, one of our problems is that so few people vote. Of course, the GOP likes it that way as was clearly stated by one of the founders of American conservatism.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,627,183 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h
So, in reality you don't actually have factual reasons. Typical of the yelling at the sky progs. Hating what you've been told to hate, not even knowing why.
This is the case of the bully blaming the bullied. You believe the left have nothing to do with anything - resist, blow up the white house, Antifa riots and destruction, Dems refusing to work with him on anything (until they got a 1.3T OmniBS spending bill)... Can you say with a straight face that MSM has been fair to him?
You cast BLAME and take little responsibility which has been the modus of the left for the last two decades.
Like I said, progs are just bullies who blame their victims for their own hate and destruction.
I have 3
-No chance at Single Payer Healthcare with an R in the White House
-No chance of removing Marijuana from DEA Schedule I with an R in the White House, or with Sessions as AG
-I don't want the Border Wall
Hilllary would of had to deal with Republican obstructionism. The same bills that passed with Trump would never have passed with Hillary if she were to offer them.
The Republicans would be harassing her over long dead issues like Benghazi. T
The country would be more stable and more respected abroard. The stock market would not have went up as fast, but would be much higher at the conclusion of her presidency than with Trump. I fully expect the market to tank given Trump's conduct and there is only so much chaos the market can take.
Clinton would have had her scandals but they would have been more personal ones not constitutional or international ones.
The nation would have been infinitely more better off.
Hilllary would of had to deal with Republican obstructionism. The same bills that passed with Trump would never have passed with Hillary if she were to offer them.
The Republicans would be harassing her over long dead issues like Benghazi. T
The country would be more stable and more respected abroard. The stock market would not have went up as fast, but would be much higher at the conclusion of her presidency than with Trump. I fully expect the market to tank given Trump's conduct and there is only so much chaos the market can take.
Clinton would have had her scandals but they would have been more personal ones not constitutional or international ones.
The nation would have been infinitely more better off.
^^^ This.
In addition, the environment and our national monuments would not be threatened by weakened regulations and by being sold off to private energy interests, public schools would be better supported, Russians would not have had state secrets passed along to them in the Oval Office, Hillary Clinton would not have threatened North Korea with nuclear annihilation, we'd have a far more articulate and intelligent president and a qualified and stable cabinet, Hillary Clinton would not be flying off to play golf at Mar-a-Lago every weekend, and Chelsea Clinton and her husband would not be presidential advisors. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton might benefit by some of Bill's insights and experience.
However, Bill would not be the fashion plate Melania is. I'd still be much happier than I am at present!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'd still be much happier than I am at present!
