Voter Fraud in New Hampshire

[JAMS14]

Originally Posted by miu

Whatever, and imo out-of-state students should be only voting with absentee ballots for their home state. They don't represent NH or have NH's best interests at heart as they live in their protected bubble in their university town. And this goes especially for any college student living in a dorm.

People who live in Florida and Arizona have been saying this about the snowbirds for years.

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by Kracer

Current standards for voter fraud are set too high to prosecute.


Can voting be the only government program that is free of fraud????


Doubt it.

FFS - we can't even get REGISTERED voters out to vote. What's in it for non-registered voters???

Originally Posted by JAMS14

One fraudulent vote out of 800,000 and all you can say is he may or may not have overstated the number ?

Here's a hint, Annie. He didn't simply overstate it, he made it up out of whole cloth. This is proof of that.



Smack your head a little harder next time. Facts obviously aren't penetrating.

Ahh well, they are still processing the information. It might take a while.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by Hoot N Annie

Making excuses doesn't change the facts - they were all votes that should not have happened. Fraud. Trump may or may not have overstated the number of improper/illegal votes but this is proof that they do happen. Try again.

Thats not the definition of fraud. An individual voting one time, in their own name in a district they live isnt fraud.

but even playing your little game, your still talking about 4 out of 800,000 votes cast.

so its you who needs to try again.

[Buckeye77]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

Thats not the definition of fraud. An individual voting one time, in their own name in a district they live isnt fraud.

but even playing your little game, your still talking about 4 out of 800,000 votes cast.

so its you who needs to try again.

You're getting closer - it's 5 out of 800,000. And if you move down ballot, any one of those 5 could impact a local election. When I lived in Florida, one of the local city council elections was initially declared a tie (approx. 2,000 total votes) then a recount gave one of the folks a 1 vote victory. So the dead guy's vote could have changed that election.

And the real issue is that the left wing has been denying the possibility of voter fraud, yet here we have examples of it in New Hampshire, of all places. A state so small everyone knows everyone else. And they are a voter ID state.

This is your cue to start shouting "But Russia! Russia!"

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by Hoot N Annie

You're getting closer - it's 5 out of 800,000. And if you move down ballot, any one of those 5 could impact a local election. When I lived in Florida, one of the local city council elections was initially declared a tie (approx. 2,000 total votes) then a recount gave one of the folks a 1 vote victory. So the dead guy's vote could have changed that election.

And the real issue is that the left wing has been denying the possibility of voter fraud, yet here we have examples of it in New Hampshire, of all places. A state so small everyone knows everyone else. And they are a voter ID state.

This is your cue to start shouting "But Russia! Russia!"

The article and the Secretary of State of New Hampshire defines it as wrongful voting, not fraud, because fraud would only apply to one of these cases.

so lets be clear

1 is the number of cases of fraud

3, is the number of wrongful cases of voting.

5 is a complete lie no matter how you try and spin it, because as I said, a kid asking the board of registrars where to vote and they direct him to the wrong precinct is not fraud.


What does voter ID have to do with a kid voting at the wrong precinct ? a mail in ballot, or someone who has not lived in an area long enough to meet residency requirements ?????

[Buckeye77]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

The article and the Secretary of State of New Hampshire defines it as wrongful voting, not fraud, because fraud would only apply to one of these cases.

so lets be clear

1 is the number of cases of fraud

3, is the number of wrongful cases of voting.

5 is a complete lie no matter how you try and spin it, because as I said, a kid asking the board of registrars where to vote and they direct him to the wrong precinct is not fraud.


What does voter ID have to do with a kid voting at the wrong precinct ? a mail in ballot, or someone who has not lived in an area long enough to meet residency requirements ?????

lol - I guess it depends on what the definition of "is" is. You are splitting hairs and you know it, and you really just keep proving me right. Have a nice day. In fact, have 5 nice days.

p.s. -my work here is done - you can have the last word

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

After an exhaustive study, it was determined that 5 votes have been determined to have been improperly cast.

A third case involved a person who voted in Hampton and Salem in the general election. The person was fined $2,500 and was told he would be criminally prosecuted if he did it again. The person had voted twice in separate towns in a prior election as well, Edwards said.

and you don't find this to be bad

a guy (has done not only this time but repeatedly)….voted more than once in these small towns where one vote could be a difference....and its not like they were neighboring towns either


voter fraud... even small fraud..is still fraud..and still wrong

[LINative]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

After an exhaustive study, it was determined that 5 votes have been determined to have been improperly cast.




Exhaustive investigation reveals little evidence of possible voter fraud in NH

That's from squeaky clean New Hampshire. Which has a total population less than my suburban county.

New Hampshire also has a limited Voter ID law, which may help limit fraud.

Now look at much larger states run by one party. The Party wants to keep itself in power at all costs because there is huge amount of $$$ to be in power in these large one party states. Large states like Illinois, New York and California. Especially California, I simply DO NOT TRUST the government of California to do the right thing.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by Hoot N Annie

lol - I guess it depends on what the definition of "is" is.

Thats like saying murder and self defense are the same thing.

You are splitting hairs and you know it,

Im not splitting hairs, you are simply pretending they are the same when they arent. Not my fault that it hurts your feelings for you to admit that your own link doesnt agree with you.