Paul Gosar’s Family Reunions Are Going To Be Difficult (ethics, democrat)

[msgsing]

Wow. That's cold. Really cold. Guess they won't be having Sunday dinner together any time soon.

[Hesychios]

There is some dis-functionality in that family.

In my family we would have privately disagreed, but not publicly. This is going to make for a difficult holiday season.

[antinimby]

Even if you disagree with your own family member you don't attack them in an ad. Liberalism drives people to do insane things. It is mind altering, like drugs.

You see it play out all the time. It's usually the Leftists that are out there angry, protesting, shouting down their opponents, rioting, etc.

[WestCobb]

Originally Posted by lifeexplorer

Coming to its senses? More like losing its mind.

Who in their right mind would support the Democrap?

Demo”crap”? Ha ha ha! 👁🌊what you did there.

[Cruithne]

Originally Posted by Hesychios

There is some dis-functionality in that family.

In my family we would have privately disagreed, but not publicly. This is going to make for a difficult holiday season.

The difference is that one if them is a public figure standing for election.
And his siblings strongly feel that is wrong for him to be elected.


There's no disfunctionality in 6 siblings strongly agreeing with one another.
It's clear that it's the candidate that went awry somewhere.


If anything there should be more of this - family members speaking out against publicly elected officials.
Trumps kids could learn a thing or two.

[Cruithne]

Originally Posted by antinimby

Even if you disagree with your own family member you don't attack them in an ad. Liberalism drives people to do insane things. It is mind altering, like drugs.

You see it play out all the time. It's usually the Leftists that are out there angry, protesting, shouting down their opponents, rioting, etc.

Protesting is a first amendment right.
Not sure why you guys keep missing that one.

[antinimby]

Originally Posted by Cruithne

Protesting is a first amendment right.
Not sure why you guys keep missing that one.

It may be legal but it is betrayal to the family, which actually speaks volume about the hateful siblings. Not sure why you guys keep missing that one.

[Catgirl64]

Originally Posted by antinimby

It may be legal but it is betrayal to the family. Not sure why you guys keep missing that one.

How far does family loyalty go? Also, is it not possible that those sibling see the candidate as the one who has betrayed the family? His positions sound pretty awful.

[Cruithne]

Originally Posted by antinimby

It may be legal but it is betrayal to the family. Not sure why you guys keep missing that one.

Keep missing what one?
This is the first thread on this subject that's come up?


So if a family member is doing something that is your eyes is against the public interest, under no circumstances should you ever speak out?

[Nanny Goat]

Wow, interesting.