Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:03 AM
 
59,437 posts, read 27,603,895 times
Reputation: 14383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoGuy View Post
She is the only real threat to the perpetual machine manufacturing lies and wars.

We have many grave threats, the skyrocketing 22 trillion dollar deficit is the biggest one. There is nothing more expensive than modern wars halfway around the world.

"Though shalt not murder" A critical rule to live by.

Trump is saying that he doesn't want war with Iran. So why did he hire Washington's biggest war monger - John Bolton? Bolton has wanted war with Iran since he gained awareness of Iran. Why the sudden and massive military build up towards Iran?

Trump tweeted: "If Tehran wants to fight, that'll be the official end of Iran"

My vote is not of great consequence. But I do know many others who are supporting Tulsi Gabbard for precisely the same reason. We are sick and tired of the lies and wars.


*Why do I attach liberal to my conservative leanings? Because I believe in freedom and small government. Government is always the antithesis of freedom.

https://www.tulsi2020.com/a/us-must-...4-281878391efb

So? you are free to support anybody you want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:03 AM
 
2,324 posts, read 2,914,762 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBurgh View Post
The 2 party system is a sham


Many folks are libertarian but dont know it
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The Libertarian party doesn't work either. Johnson picked Weld as his running mate.

He seemed to be a popular governor, anyways



I tend to focus more on state and local issues
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Southern Colorado
3,680 posts, read 2,983,786 times
Reputation: 4809
Gabbard is a CFR member. That represents immeasurable funding and power if she tows the line of prevailing leadership. I would not under estimate her with CFR backing. Here is Hillary Clinton saying that the CFR runs the country:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfpgl6NqF0I
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:06 AM
 
14,081 posts, read 5,695,072 times
Reputation: 8712
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoGuy View Post
Ron Paul was quite consistent from the start to the finish. The establishment GOP took him out.
No he wasn't. All you have to do is check pork spending, and the cracks in his foundation are glaring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:06 AM
 
10,512 posts, read 5,195,668 times
Reputation: 14056
Tulsi Gabbard refuses to call Syria's Assad a war criminal and denies he's used chemical weapons against citizens.


She's also getting support from some pro-Putin interests.


That's disqualifying. No to Gabbard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Southern Colorado
3,680 posts, read 2,983,786 times
Reputation: 4809
The infamous Dick Chainee was a CFR director prior to running the country for years. Now he is partnered up with the Rothschild dynasty and Genie Energy - drilling in the "Syrian Golan Heights". I mean - who is going to stop them?

I do believe that Trump was trying to work in America's best interest which I do not give credit to other POTUS's until one goes back to Reagan. He can retain much of his base if he puts his mind to it.

Much of his support comes from his MIC and Netanyahu alliance. He is immeasurably "stuck in the middle" right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,963 posts, read 17,947,470 times
Reputation: 10385
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoGuy View Post
She is the only real threat to the perpetual machine manufacturing lies and wars.

We have many grave threats, the skyrocketing 22 trillion dollar deficit is the biggest one. There is nothing more expensive than modern wars halfway around the world.

"Though shalt not murder" A critical rule to live by.

Trump is saying that he doesn't want war with Iran. So why did he hire Washington's biggest war monger - John Bolton? Bolton has wanted war with Iran since he gained awareness of Iran. Why the sudden and massive military build up towards Iran?

Trump tweeted: "If Tehran wants to fight, that'll be the official end of Iran"

My vote is not of great consequence. But I do know many others who are supporting Tulsi Gabbard for precisely the same reason. We are sick and tired of the lies and wars.


*Why do I attach liberal to my conservative leanings? Because I believe in freedom and small government. Government is always the antithesis of freedom.

https://www.tulsi2020.com/a/us-must-...4-281878391efb
She's a member of CFR. She's into NATO - The Constitution gives us our marching orders not a made up group of non Americans.

In favor of the Auth for Use of Military Force by the President - The Founders and the Constitution tell us Congress votes to go to war and not one person.

For the US to provide the Ukraine with military assitance -Where is getting involved in other nations civil wars in the Constitution?

Look at her voting record. She votes for war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:16 AM
 
45,311 posts, read 26,582,895 times
Reputation: 25060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Tulsi Gabbard refuses to call Syria's Assad a war criminal and denies he's used chemical weapons against citizens.


She's also getting support from some pro-Putin interests.


That's disqualifying. No to Gabbard.
this quote illustrates why the neocons have a problem w/her. Its not that Gabbard is a non -interventionist, its just that she isnt willing to meddle in the same areas or for the same reasons as they are.
Quote:
Tulsi Gabbard on Foreign Policy
$500M and 3,000 troops to Africa to fight Ebola.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,753 posts, read 14,889,306 times
Reputation: 35592
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoGuy View Post
She is the only real threat to the perpetual machine manufacturing lies and wars.

We have many grave threats, the skyrocketing 22 trillion dollar deficit is the biggest one. There is nothing more expensive than modern wars halfway around the world.

"Though shalt not murder" A critical rule to live by.

Trump is saying that he doesn't want war with Iran. So why did he hire Washington's biggest war monger - John Bolton? Bolton has wanted war with Iran since he gained awareness of Iran. Why the sudden and massive military build up towards Iran?

Trump tweeted: "If Tehran wants to fight, that'll be the official end of Iran"

My vote is not of great consequence. But I do know many others who are supporting Tulsi Gabbard for precisely the same reason. We are sick and tired of the lies and wars.


*Why do I attach liberal to my conservative leanings? Because I believe in freedom and small government. Government is always the antithesis of freedom.

https://www.tulsi2020.com/a/us-must-...4-281878391efb

Just say no to drugs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,963 posts, read 17,947,470 times
Reputation: 10385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Tulsi Gabbard refuses to call Syria's Assad a war criminal and denies he's used chemical weapons against citizens.


She's also getting support from some pro-Putin interests.


That's disqualifying. No to Gabbard.
There is no proof he has used gas on his citizens. Especially since the citizens support him. The gas found the first time was a rebel building housing gas. Not doubt supplied by the Clinton administration.

And then Trump went after him on a lie.

"Some American military and intelligence officials were especially distressed by the president's determination to ignore the evidence. "None of this makes any sense," one officer told colleagues upon learning of the decision to bomb. "We KNOW that there was no chemical attack ... the Russians are furious. Claiming we have the real intel and know the truth ... I guess it didn't matter whether we elected Clinton or Trump.“

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...ed-them-anyway
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top