Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2019, 06:37 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

At this time in 2015, most media, including Fox News, did not take Trump seriously.

Nonetheless, he was good for ratings and received way more than his fair share of media attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2019, 06:39 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,550 posts, read 17,223,445 times
Reputation: 17588
Correction!


Not the media....who does the official socialist democrat propaganda want to be elected!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 06:55 AM
 
9,375 posts, read 6,975,888 times
Reputation: 14777
They want Trump to be of course as it gives them endless material. Nobody was watching CNN MSNBC after an Obama speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 07:23 AM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharks With Lasers View Post
I'm having a hard time coming up with an answer, at least for the current state of things.

I think they REALLY wanted (and outright expected) Hillary Clinton to be president, both in 2008 and especially in 2016. I think they are very angry at both Trump, and to some extent Sanders, for disrupting their plans. So in many ways, I think they are throwing a hissy fit about anybody being elected president in 2020.

That being said, I think the media wants something of a Bush-Clinton dynasty. I think that they're dream match-up would have been Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, and they would have been okay with either winning.

Speaking of Trump, he's somewhat of an enigma for me in terms of what the media things. On the one hand, he's phenomenal for ratings, giving media exposure that they could only dream of with other candidates. Plus, if you like him, Trump will generally be on your side. On the other hand, Trump is terribly corrupt and is threatening the integrity of the journalism profession by declaring outlets like the New York Times and the Washington Post as enemies of the state. So they also view Trump as dangerous and want somebody who respects freedom of speech.

In terms of the top Democratic candidates, it's obvious that the media doesn't like Sanders or Buttigieg, and seems a bit unconvinced on Warren and Harris. They liked Beto O'Rourke for a while, but he seems to have faded. They really liked Biden, until about a month after he announced his candidacy, and now they've done a complete about-face from what I can tell.

It's almost like the media just wants to be angry and pout about 2016. What you all think?


Chairman Mao
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,483 posts, read 17,226,594 times
Reputation: 35781
The media would love to see Hillary rise from the ashes to take on the Monster Trump like a Davy and Goliath story.



In 2016 the media was pushing for a Bush Clinton showdown and poor no energy JEB! let them down.





The thing is whomever pops out of the sunroof of the Democrat clown car the media will get the propaganda machine running on all cylinders for them and they will try to grind Trump into the pavement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Manchester NH
15,507 posts, read 6,431,235 times
Reputation: 4831
They don't want Biden because he doesn't fit the 'changing party' narrative.

Besides that its hard to tell, they seem to be leaning towards Pete or Warren, someone young and 'progressive'.

They also like Trump, but Trump gives them a hard time so its less obvious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 08:24 AM
 
339 posts, read 127,527 times
Reputation: 363
Who does the media want to be president?

Interesting because regardless of slant, when news outlets cover Trump their ratings go up. Just think of all the full-time Trump bashers on CNN/MSNBC that would be out of work if he wasn't in office. I think they want him in there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,361,490 times
Reputation: 23858
The media has no plans, Sharks.

They are all magpies, who are always attracted to the latest shiny object they see.
Once they've picked up that object, they go looking for the next one. And the first is discarded and forgotten.

The media doesn't plan doodley-squat. They don't have to make plans, as there are always plenty of shiny objects to catch their attention around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,894,142 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
I haven't seen too many negative stories on Bernie, though. For example they never seem to address the murky nature of his self-described 'socialism.' He makes allusions to Scandinavian countries which are capitalist 'social democracies,' not socialist. But Bernie's history suggests that he's a true blue socialist (i.e. gov't ownership of the means of production), as in Venezuela, Cuba, etc.

Maybe they figure Bernie will eventually self-implode, and so their involvement is not necessary. I do tend to think that if he's the nominee, it will be a 40-45 state blowout for Trump.
No what I mean is that Bernie isn T treated as fair as others. That said, he is treated better than he was this time four years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2019, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,894,142 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
At this time in 2015, most media, including Fox News, did not take Trump seriously.

Nonetheless, he was good for ratings and received way more than his fair share of media attention.
I often say that CNN treated him more fairly than Fox did. Why, CNN gave him bi-weekly interviews despite having the panels that weren't as fair to him, Fox saw him as a threat at the time. Then he won and they changed their tune.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top