Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2020, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
25,920 posts, read 12,943,406 times
Reputation: 19443

Advertisements

Wow, how condescending is that statement to American voters?

If American voters "do not deserve to know" your stance on such an important matter Joe, then you do NOT deserve our votes; you worthless piece of chit.

How can anyone vote for this senile old fart?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2020, 11:09 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,474 posts, read 11,589,442 times
Reputation: 11992
I literally just saw this headline on FoxNews. Are you just reposting their headlines here? That seems kind of lazy.

I also watched the exchange. He said Republican voters who are trying to deflect from what Trump is currently doing don’t deserve to know. Pretty funny.

Last edited by SkyDog77; 10-10-2020 at 11:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Kansas
26,009 posts, read 22,203,791 times
Reputation: 26765
Maybe Biden has agreed to step down soon after being sworn in as POTUS, thus it should be Kamala Harris answering this question. Another possibility is that Biden can't remember what his stance is on the subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 11:40 AM
 
8,509 posts, read 8,840,496 times
Reputation: 5727
Did not say the full statement in quotes. Responded to a partisan question with only part of that statement. Using quotes for a statement not fully said is lying. Quoting what he actually said would hurt because it was bad choice of words but creating a longer false quote messes that up. Put it in ' ' if you want to write it yourself / interpret. The news outlets I saw did, but not the OP. You can't honestly call it a quote if it wasnt said as written.

Candidates will decide what to say and when. It may look bad to not answer. Answers can be made to look bad too. Not every decision is pre-determined. He may not have an answer yet. What the court does could affect that.

Last edited by NW Crow; 10-10-2020 at 12:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 11:50 AM
 
8,948 posts, read 2,976,284 times
Reputation: 5175
Why can't he just answer the question?

His logic is that if he answers it, networks will cover it!

NO ****! You're running for the POTUS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 11:56 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,474 posts, read 11,589,442 times
Reputation: 11992
Quote:
Originally Posted by paracord View Post
Why can't he just answer the question?

His logic is that if he answers it, networks will cover it!

NO ****! You're running for the POTUS!
He should answer when Trump weighs in on his taxes, Russian bounties, and his healthcare plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 01:18 PM
 
4,861 posts, read 9,325,146 times
Reputation: 7762
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
Maybe Biden has agreed to step down soon after being sworn in as POTUS, thus it should be Kamala Harris answering this question. Another possibility is that Biden can't remember what his stance is on the subject.
Mike Pence asked Kamala this same question more than once during the VP debate and she smirked and grimaced and deflected and flatly refused to answer. this crazy woman has a whole bunch of things up her sleeve if she (er, Biden) wins. Scary stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 02:07 PM
 
8,948 posts, read 2,976,284 times
Reputation: 5175
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog77 View Post
He should answer when Trump weighs in on his taxes, Russian bounties, and his healthcare plan.
Baloney.

Trump's taxes have ZERO affect on anything.

"Russian Bounties" are made up gossip

and Republicans don't want a federal "Healthcare Plan" because we don't want socialized medicine. Trump has announced his "plan" and that is to repeal OCare and improve private insurance.

So, how about that answer now from Biden?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2020, 02:20 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,474 posts, read 11,589,442 times
Reputation: 11992
Quote:
Originally Posted by paracord View Post
Baloney.

Trump's taxes have ZERO affect on anything.

"Russian Bounties" are made up gossip

and Republicans don't want a federal "Healthcare Plan" because we don't want socialized medicine. Trump has announced his "plan" and that is to repeal OCare and improve private insurance.

So, how about that answer now from Biden?
Your spin is astounding. He promised to release them and still hasn’t. He promised to release a healthcare plan and still hasn’t. The generals disagree with you on bounties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2020, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Florida
1,049 posts, read 964,483 times
Reputation: 940
Quote:
Originally Posted by paracord View Post
Baloney.

Trump's taxes have ZERO affect on anything.

"Russian Bounties" are made up gossip

and Republicans don't want a federal "Healthcare Plan" because we don't want socialized medicine. Trump has announced his "plan" and that is to repeal OCare and improve private insurance.

So, how about that answer now from Biden?

Trump's taxes do have an affect if he is shown as owing debts to foreign banks or entities. It's a national security issue.

The Russian Bounty issue was actually verified by our intelligence agencies. So yeah, not gossip.


How will he "improve" private insurance? Why doesn't he share his plan he had 4 years to formulate?

Biden doesn't have to answer anything until senate Republicans answer why they flip-flopped on the issue of appointing a supreme court justice in an election year. This court packing thing was just now brought up to deflect from their own blatant hypocrisy.

BTW, court-packing is nothing new (maybe to the politically ignorant). Both Abraham Lincoln and FDR tried to add justices to the supreme court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top