Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Before you start accusing me of being a Dem/liberal I voted for Ducey twice. And would probably have voted for Robinson over Hobbs and maybe even Lake if she didn't start squawking about the election being rigged.
If Lake loses that will be her downfall in my opinion.
Then I have to expose you for your voting for Robson (not Robinson) get the name right if you say you would vote for her. Again, During her campaign for the Republican primary nomination, Taylor Robson refused to say whether, if she had been governor, she would have certified the results of the 2020 Presidential presidential election. She questioned the legitimacy of the election, asserting that "the elections weren't fair" and that "our election was absolutely not fair." Sounds like Robson did question the elections and agrees with Lake and since Lake and Robson got 757,522 votes combine in the primaries compared to 431,059 for Hobbs, then that topic that you bring so much isn't a topic for the general or an issue that will decide the election.
By the way, during her campaign, Taylor Robson said that she would enforce Arizona's pre-Roe abortion ban which would criminalize the action in most circumstances. She went full Pence in Arizona. Lake will not support any of that, making Robson to the right of Lake. So those 2 big reasons why I question your post that you would have voted for Robson. No you wouldn't if what you say about Lake is true.
I don't know what are your principles but saying you would vote for Robson over Hobbs but not Lake is very confusing reason why.
Do you care about her discrimination lawsuit she lost twice by the courts? Would you get a promotion at your job if you cost the company a discrimination lawsuit twice? I really doubt if you would have a job in the company after that.
Do you care about her discrimination lawsuit she lost twice by the courts? Would you get a promotion at your job if you cost the company a discrimination lawsuit twice? I really doubt if you would have a job in the company after that.
I don't care really it's the lesser of two evils Hobbs, and Kelly will get votes from 3 of my family members. That will be 4 votes for Hobbs and Kelly including me you get 0 votes.
I don't care really it's the lesser of two evils Hobbs, and Kelly will get votes from 3 of my family members. That will be 4 votes for Hobbs and Kelly including me you get 0 votes.
Juan likes to play the guilt trip game and deflect every time he gets challenged on the election denier lake.
Do you care about her discrimination lawsuit she lost twice by the courts? Would you get a promotion at your job if you cost the company a discrimination lawsuit twice? I really doubt if you would have a job in the company after that.
We all get it….you don’t like Hobbs. You think she has many flaws and the election is certain to result in a win for Lake. Being so certain should relieve you of the burden of having to be dismissive of any perspective that is not consistent with your own.
I don't care really it's the lesser of two evils Hobbs, and Kelly will get votes from 3 of my family members. That will be 4 votes for Hobbs and Kelly including me you get 0 votes.
I already knew your answer, you at least confirmed it but you say you are NOT a Democrat. Riiiight.
I will hope all of you vote once. Make sure you have proper I.D. for those mail in ballots.
By the way, I don't know how lower can you go by being found guilty of racism/discrimination, being for abortions on demand up to the 9th month and having open borders. Lesser of the 2 evils?
Juan likes to play the guilt trip game and deflect every time he gets challenged on the election denier lake.
I'm not playing. I made the case that you don't know for who you are voting for. You say you will never vote for Lake because she is an election denier but say you would have voted for Robinson, err Robson, over Hobbs when Robson is an election "denier" also.
If your #1 reason in the election to vote is not being an election denier then you couldn't vote for Robson. Isn't that a contraction? Isn't that goofy?
We all get it….you don’t like Hobbs. You think she has many flaws and the election is certain to result in a win for Lake. Being so certain should relieve you of the burden of having to be dismissive of any perspective that is not consistent with your own.
If Hobbs was a Republican under the same scenario my opinion would be the same. I don't think, she does have many flaws and refusing to debate exposes 2 mayor flaws.
This is from an independent liberal hippie and this is the best take of the race. He gives Lake 75% of winning and Hobbs is unfit for office and he is saying from the liberal side.
If Hobbs was a Republican under the same scenario my opinion would be the same. I don't think, she does have many flaws and refusing to debate exposes 2 mayor flaws.
I’m curious. In the event Lake loses, what are you going to say happened?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again, During her campaign for the Republican primary nomination, Taylor Robson refused to say whether, if she had been governor, she would have certified the results of the 2020 Presidential presidential election. She questioned the legitimacy of the election, asserting that "the elections weren't fair" and that "our election was absolutely not fair." 
