Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Indeed. But I just thought of a way he could get out of it, if he wanted -- he could tell her that the American people shouldn't have to pay for an in-law's housing and maintenance. That might work.
No, now you're talking about taking away her entitlement.
Insinuating that he is going to be henpecked by stereotypical nagging women is sexist.
Sorry.
I'm not insinuating anything. Michelle is known to be a strong personality, one whom they had to hide at times because of her mouth. Add an in-law into ANY household and you get tension.
But, let me guess -- you are an adult still living at home so you don't understand the problem that the rest of us see?
I'm not insinuating anything. Michelle is known to be a strong personality, one whom they had to hide at times because of her mouth. Add an in-law into ANY household and you get tension.
But, let me guess -- you are an adult still living at home so you don't understand the problem that the rest of us see?
Yeah, an adult living in their own home, bought and paid for - unlike most, so you're actually right, oh clever one.
Anyway, don't let me get in the way of further hypocrisy.
In August, The New York Times Magazine did a story about trolls, some barely out of their teens, who antagonize others for the sake of "lulz": "Lulz is watching someone lose their mind at their computer 2,000 miles away while you chat with friends and laugh," one ex-troll told the publication.
Some people are just bitter and angry," said psychiatrist Dr. Terry Eagan, medical director of the Moonview Sanctuary in Santa Monica, California. "Sometimes, they're against everyone, other times against a specific group. That person can get really stimulated and can say all sorts of horrible things. But I don't think it's not like they didn't exist before."
Yeah, an adult living in their own home, bought and paid for - unlike most, so you're actually right, oh clever one.
Anyway, don't let me get in the way of further hypocrisy.
Don't mind teatime, Guero. She probably doesn't know any better. Judging from her attitude on this forum, it's no wonder she *thinks* everyone has tension with their in-laws. I'm sure her in-laws can attest to tension they undoubtedly feel when they're around her. She doesn't seem to understand that most sane, happy people actually have no problem getting along with their in-laws.
Furthermore, I'm sure with everything going on right now, Obama's concerned that his mother in law will be living nearby.
Don't mind teatime, Guero. She probably doesn't know any better. Judging from her attitude on this forum, it's no wonder she *thinks* everyone has tension with their in-laws. I'm sure her in-laws can attest to tension they undoubtedly feel when they're around her. She doesn't seem to understand that most sane, happy people actually have no problem getting along with their in-laws.
Furthermore, I'm sure with everything going on right now, Obama's concerned that his mother in law will be living nearby.
Can't rep you again it says, but here's a thumbs up!
Is that something that has been done before? I don't think that even sounds right. The White House is for the first family, not everyone in the family.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
