Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The thought of an inexperienced, uninformed woman or man being a heartbeat from the Presidency scares the daylights out of anyone who gives a rap about America. With your implication attractiveness is somehow relevant I believe you must've confused this with American Idol
Quote:
The thought of an inexperienced, uninformed woman or man being a heartbeat from the Presidency scares the daylights out of anyone who gives a rap about America.
if what you say in this quote is true, then obama should have never been elected either. after all being a community organizer does not qualify him to become potus, and it is showing with him filling up his cabinet with clinton cronies.
if what you say in this quote is true, then obama should have never been elected either. after all being a community organizer does not qualify him to become potus, and it is showing with him filling up his cabinet with clinton cronies.
That community organizing beat the living bejesus out of the Republicans, now didn't it? And he is already laying the foundation for '12......Organize that.
if what you say in this quote is true, then obama should have never been elected either. after all being a community organizer does not qualify him to become potus, and it is showing with him filling up his cabinet with clinton cronies.
well his senate work,
if he's allowed to run as president and get elected with minimum experience how is that wrong, if she/he's eligable to run he's qualified!!! (if he does a good job why complain. i would think that is better than a president with acceptable experience by the overall public who turns out to be nothing but a law breaking criminal)
if not then the US should change its requirements for one to hold the highest office.
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,017,002 times
Reputation: 9418
Liberals don't need a reason to hate. They ooze hatred b'c they're just filled with it. True, there are some conservative haters but it seems to be most prevalent with the liberals--like a trademark for them. Or a badge. More like a melanoma on their skin for everyone to see.
Liberals don't need a reason to hate. They ooze hatred b'c they're just filled with it. True, there are some conservative haters but it seems to be most prevalent with the liberals--like a trademark for them. Or a badge. More like a melanoma on their skin for everyone to see.
What a silly thing to say, of course liberals need a reason to hate. However, I think the group that involves us in poorly-planned wars and that works hard to increase the economic and racial divisions at home is the more naturally hate- (and fear-)filled group, do you think?
Liberals don't need a reason to hate. They ooze hatred b'c they're just filled with it. True, there are some conservative haters but it seems to be most prevalent with the liberals--like a trademark for them. Or a badge. More like a melanoma on their skin for everyone to see.
Your posts are far more hateful than any a 'liberal' posts. Seems to me your the one filled with hate and the election of President-elect Obama just gave you more fodder for that hate.
if he's allowed to run as president and get elected with minimum experience how is that wrong, if she/he's eligable to run he's qualified!!! (if he does a good job why complain. i would think that is better than a president with acceptable experience by the overall public who turns out to be nothing but a law breaking criminal)
if not then the US should change its requirements for one to hold the highest office.
what senate work? you must mean all the days that he missed right?
also look what you said, if they run then he or she is qualified. now take a look at what the democrats were screaming about, "palin was not qualified to be veep". doesnt hold the same water, either both were qualified or neither was.
fact is, a governor of any US state is more qualified to be potus than any senator, as senators are just good at throwing other peoples money out the window and stepping on peoples toes.
Your posts are far more hateful than any a 'liberal' posts. Seems to me your the one filled with hate and the election of President-elect Obama just gave you more fodder for that hate.
so, has hatred become illegal now? or is that just reserved for liberals and democrats?
democrats and socialists have hated bush since 2000, seems the rest of us should be allowed to hate obama and hilary if we so choose.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
