Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did I say nobody wants to go there? Your text doesn't make any sense. Maybe you could rephrase?
We have the best quality of life, I told you already.
Average Chinese, Malaysian is poor as ****. Japan has it little better but they work 24/7 in highly stressful jobs.
Then those imigrants want to have a quick easy life.
We are the second generation of well being.. My grandparents starved, were quite poor .. But nobody of them went out of their country. The well being is for us. Not for the first who want to come and steal it from us.
Well ..they want the easy life..so they won't go to japan. Well I won t give them the easy life with free welfare. No. But I won't drow them in the see neverless. I would buy them tickets to more rich lands than my own (Australia, USA, nz) as here there isn't much work
Yea sure, it's not my problem if some alcoholics get kicked out of their apartments and some people are too proub to visit the social security office. Please explain me why most people don't go to sossu if they are so hungry? And the biggest food giveaway is in one of the priciest and wealthiest parts of the most expensive city in the Finland? And why this problem doesn't exist outside of the helsinki metro?
It's not a human right to live in Helsinki if you can't afford it.
PS. Explain me this: If I'm not an alcoholic/drug abuser etc. and I get unemployed. Please explain me how it's possible that I can't afford food? Even if I go to sossu after receiving all the other subsidies? Your claims don't make any sense for normal people. If you are one of those hippies who think that romanian beggars should be granted with health care, please kill yourself
The 'violent' gene: Genetic mutation found only in Finnish men that makes them fight
Domestic violence toward women is very common some in the scandinavian and nordic countries. It is not just immigrants, they just commit different type of crimes as gang rapes and more toward strangers.
Why situation is like that in Sweden is that big part of men are total fine with violence toward women (also some officers). It also explains why feminism is high in these countries. It is the way how women try to get out of this violent hell.
According to studies "In Sweden, 81 percent of women said they had been harassed at some point after the age of 15 - compared to the EU average of 55 percent. After Sweden, which had the highest rate, Denmark, France, the Netherland and Finland all saw rates above 70 percent. The EU member state with the lowest rate - 24 percent - was Bulgaria."
"In all of the six main areas covered by the survey, Finland was found to have levels of physical and sexual violence against women that were at times significantly above the European average. Almost half of Finnish women - 47 percent - reported having experienced physical and/or sexual violence since the age of 15, compared to a Europe-wide average of 33 percent."
When "67 percent said they did not report the incident to the police" the actual number might be bigger.
Women are on their own and as women are physically weaker, they have no chance to put men in order even they would want to. Also some of the police officers beat their spouses so there is no secure to women in these countries.
Of course there are men who don't lift a finger against a woman, according to study it is 50-50. Those women who are not able to marry 50% of nice men population either suffer or chooses to live alone.
Why would men like that protect their women? And how could women self-defence when they are physically weaker?
It does not solve violence issue if there would not be any immigrants, still 50% women or more would be beated and abused by their spouses etc. by their own country men.
"Compared to the other Nordic countries, it is clear that Finland has been slower to reform
its legislation on violence against women and rape. For example, Sweden was one of the first
countries in the world to declare rape within marriage a crime, while Finland was among
the last in Europe to criminalize marital rape." https://www.amnesty.org/.../act770012010eng.pdf
Swedish 'social experiment' shows people ignoring domestic abuse in a lift
According to studies "In Sweden, 81 percent of women said they had been harassed at some point after the age of 15 - compared to the EU average of 55 percent. After Sweden, which had the highest rate, Denmark, France, the Netherland and Finland all saw rates above 70 percent. The EU member state with the lowest rate - 24 percent - was Bulgaria."
You're straying off topic which is about the EU implementing mandatory quotas for asylum seekers.
You're straying off topic which is about the EU implementing mandatory quotas for asylum seekers.
I am telling to seekers why not choose to leave their homeland behind because of benefits or "better life". Because benefits are not enough for living, because 2 jobs are not enough, because of first worlds hunger and because of violence. Also I am telling EU cannot/want to even feed their current population so how they could feed more? It is in topic but I think I said already what I was going to.
This is hardly a surprise, as we were in the middle of the worst recession ever. Hit us harder than the Wall Street Crash. We peaked at almost 20% unemployment, companies, banks, factories fell like flies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by soUlwounD
The 'violent' gene: Genetic mutation found only in Finnish men that makes them fight
Violent gene in finnish men seems to be true also.
Well, Daily Mail... The violent mutation exists, but it's actually more common among women. Anyway, I think I read that only 6% of the populace has it, and it's often recessive, as people are clever enough even while drunk.
Nevertheless, by global, EU, OECD... any standards, Finland is an extremely safe country. All crimes are below the EU average. All, including violent crime.
Quote:
Originally Posted by soUlwounD
"Compared to the other Nordic countries, it is clear that Finland has been slower to reform
its legislation on violence against women and rape. For example, Sweden was one of the first
countries in the world to declare rape within marriage a crime, while Finland was among
the last in Europe to criminalize marital rape." https://www.amnesty.org/.../act770012010eng.pdf
Quite oddly phrased, as Finland outlawed marital rape before like France and Germany. That gives the impression we were exceptionally late, which isn't true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by soUlwounD
Of course there are men who don't lift a finger against a woman, according to study it is 50-50. Those women who are not able to marry 50% of nice men population either suffer or chooses to live alone.
This is a very sexist statement, and victimising only women. I will use necessary physical force against anyone who assaults me, vagina or no vagina. Gender equality goes both ways. Luckily I haven't had the need.
Last edited by Ariete; 05-15-2015 at 03:30 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And the biggest food giveaway is in one of the priciest and wealthiest parts of the most expensive city in the Finland? And why this problem doesn't exist outside of the helsinki metro?
