Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2013, 01:13 PM
 
993 posts, read 1,561,293 times
Reputation: 2029

Advertisements

I don't know, but it annoys me. So does their hijacking of the term "curvy".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2013, 02:02 PM
 
Location: NC
1,225 posts, read 2,420,857 times
Reputation: 673
Thick doesnt necessarily mean fat but curvy usually does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 02:05 PM
 
3,633 posts, read 6,174,886 times
Reputation: 11376
A friend of mine on FB showed a Washington Post corrections column that says, "An Oct. 14 Style section incorrectly referred to Navy Capt. Robert Durand as 'thickset.' He should have been described as 'muscular.'"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 02:32 PM
 
2,888 posts, read 6,539,616 times
Reputation: 4654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocco Barbosa View Post
It's going to far. A lot of these women are CLEARLY, fat. Does calling yourself "thick" make you feel better about yourself?
Should they call themselves fat to make you happy?

Just keep telling yourself that you are empathy-challenged. Or you can just make us happy and call yourself rude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 03:05 PM
 
229 posts, read 534,121 times
Reputation: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissNM View Post
Should they call themselves fat to make you happy?

Just keep telling yourself that you are empathy-challenged. Or you can just make us happy and call yourself rude.
They shouldn't use the wrong term. He's not rude, they're just wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Central Mass
4,629 posts, read 4,898,966 times
Reputation: 5376
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriCounty View Post
They shouldn't use the wrong term. He's not rude, they're just wrong.
Thick is the correct term. Thick means when the opposite sides or surfaces are a relatively great distance apart. To be obese LITERALLY means to be thick! Theoretically, overweight could or could not be thick, depends on what "relatively great" means.

The Willamses are not thick. Thicker than average, but their opposing sides are not a relatively great distance apart...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 03:17 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,142,209 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocco Barbosa View Post
Do they really carry it well?
Does your criticism/skepticism of it "make you feel better about yourself"??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 03:22 PM
 
35,094 posts, read 51,251,824 times
Reputation: 62669
Here all these years I thought "thick" described the gravy that has too much flour or corn starch in it.
I had no idea one could describe a human as thick....who knew
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 03:24 PM
 
229 posts, read 534,121 times
Reputation: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio516 View Post
Thick is the correct term. Thick means when the opposite sides or surfaces are a relatively great distance apart. To be obese LITERALLY means to be thick! Theoretically, overweight could or could not be thick, depends on what "relatively great" means.

The Willamses are not thick. Thicker than average, but their opposing sides are not a relatively great distance apart...
That is incorrect when applying it a woman's body.

The correct usage:

"When a woman's body has weight on it, but not ugly, out of shape weight. More like medium and curvy. A round behind and firm, full legs is considered thick."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 04:00 PM
 
Location: SE Michigan
6,191 posts, read 18,162,988 times
Reputation: 10355
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriCounty View Post
That is incorrect when applying it a woman's body.

The correct usage:

"When a woman's body has weight on it, but not ugly, out of shape weight. More like medium and curvy. A round behind and firm, full legs is considered thick."
Like Queen Latifah?

https://www.google.com/search?q=quee...w=1680&bih=921
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top