Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2012, 11:08 AM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,781 times
Reputation: 699

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Are you sure it is from 1990? DC would make zero sense as it has grown dramatically since then, this map shows it just below Philly which would align with 2010 and not 1990.

I looked for the reference and all I could find was 2010; which in looking at the data it makes FAR more sense for 2010 than 1990 on a number of cities
I am certain the map by the OP is 22 years obsolete, the one I posted of is 12 years outdated now.

Here is a website that has both maps along with their authors and date of creation for comparison US Population Density 1990 and 2000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2012, 11:28 AM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,781 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flborn_halfback View Post
I'll have to look at this on the laptop, because right now I am looking at it on my Pad and it is no where near as impressive as the OP, even if it is 10 years more recent!
Yes but you have to understand that both maps are portraying different decades 1990 vs 2000 and both are created by different authors/illustrators. Your map was created by Agnew Moyer Smith who owns his own private agency and my map was created by TIME magazines Joe Lertola. While they're meant to show similarities, they have their differences as is noticeable
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Savannah, GA
4,582 posts, read 8,972,542 times
Reputation: 2421
For Atlanta, keep in mind that in 1990 the metro had a population of just 2.9 million compared to the 5.4 million it has in this decade. Either way, our density is still very low compared to other cities of similar size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 06:42 AM
 
60 posts, read 104,099 times
Reputation: 34
I noticed in another thread, someone talking about the majority of the population in Colorado being located on the east side of the mountains. This map definitely shows that to be true, but it is still amazing to see how the map just flattens out throughout that entire region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top