Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2013, 10:23 AM
 
7,330 posts, read 15,383,950 times
Reputation: 3800

Advertisements

It's not about which is better, because that's basically a meaningless question. It's all about the city, and the area of the city in which you live. Past a certain point of congestion, a car becomes more of a hassle than a blessing. Honestly, though, those places are few. Even in cities in which you can easily get by without a car, there are larges areas of town where having one isn't a problem, and comes in handy.

For me, having a car isn't automatically "freedom". If parking is ridiculously expensive or hard to come by, or takes forever, it's so nice to have the option to hop a bus or train instead. In other cities, the congestion isn't at a point where it makes sense to take public transit. There's no one-size-fits-all model.

Pick a city. Get a job. Weigh your options.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2013, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,097 posts, read 34,702,478 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
I always laugh at just how many people do the "eww....a bus?" when they're not use to riding one.
That's not my reaction to buses. I will only take a bus if it's a short distance along a very, very busy route. But once you start talking about a ride that's longer than 10-15 minutes and transfers, I'm not having any part of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 10:43 AM
 
Location: The Magnolia City
8,928 posts, read 14,335,594 times
Reputation: 4853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
It obviously all depends on where you live, work and play. I would say around 2/3 of my friends don't own cars. They're almost all professionals making $50-$125K a year, but just have no need for a car (like myself).

I had one when I lived outside the city, got it the day I turned 16 and assumed only a nuclear war would every separate me from a car. Had it for about a year when I moved to Chicago - during which time something TOTALLY unanticipated happened. I started HATING the thing. I hardly ever used it, had to move it across the street sometimes, got a few tickets, it needed work, gas, insurance, etc. It went from a beautiful asset to an annoying liability within about 6 months. Finally it broke down and I decided to ditch it and save a few bucks by seeing how long I could go in the meantime before getting another one. One month turned into two, turned into a few years and now it's been a decade.

My key is I work downtown, I've always planned my apartments and now my condo to be within a few minutes walk of the train, and I can walk almost anywhere to bars, restaurants, grocery store, friends house, etc or just take a quick bus ride. I have friends with cars, but they normally only use them for work and then maybe once a week or so to run errands if need be. My BF has a car right there at his house, but of all the places we go, we drive to maybe 10% of them. Costco is the only thing I can think of. Train and bus are just easier cause you don't have to mess with traffic and parking. Usually we just walk everywhere.

I always laugh at just how many people do the "eww....a bus?" when they're not use to riding one. I mean they're full of the same random people just going to work downtown or running errands. I've certainly never felt unsafe on a bus or a train. People don't bother me. Everyone is just playing on their Iphones or reading, sleeping, gazing out the window.

I would certainly buy a car if I moved away though, but for now I LOVE having the extra thousands of dollars a year by just using my $86 (taken out before income taxes as well) unlimited ride for the month.
Far cheaper than owning a car, for sure, but that's way overpriced. That's 1000 dollars/yr. just for public transportation. That's ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 10:54 AM
 
7,330 posts, read 15,383,950 times
Reputation: 3800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairobi View Post
Far cheaper than owning a car, for sure, but that's way overpriced. That's 1000 dollars/yr. just for public transportation. That's ridiculous.
For a system that can legitimately allow you to live carless in a city in which it is expensive and troublesome, in many areas, to own a car, it's a bargain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,097 posts, read 34,702,478 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
Train and bus are just easier cause you don't have to mess with traffic and parking. Usually we just walk everywhere.
You're better than me. If I'm going to Park Slope, I'm driving. I honestly don't think transit is that convenient in Brooklyn (not compared to driving anyway) so I'm always somewhat amazed when people in other cities say they walk or take transit virtually everywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 11:15 AM
 
1,018 posts, read 1,850,028 times
Reputation: 761
Originally Posted by Carlite

Exactly, most of the car culture-types are too delicate and/or pretentious to be caught dead in one of those "underground thingies" or on a bus (god forbid).

Somebody has changed this, accidentally or deliberately. I don't know what the intent is here, but it's now how I address issues.

Last edited by Carlite; 01-02-2013 at 11:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,097 posts, read 34,702,478 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDF View Post
I don't see many cons to not having a car. As long as you live somewhere where it's do-able.
Lack of efficient mobility is a huge con.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 11:42 AM
 
Location: The Magnolia City
8,928 posts, read 14,335,594 times
Reputation: 4853
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarolinaBredChicagoan View Post
For a system that can legitimately allow you to live carless in a city in which it is expensive and troublesome, in many areas, to own a car, it's a bargain.
Obviously if one has no other options, but it still sucks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlite View Post
Originally Posted by Carlite

Exactly, most of the car culture-types are too delicate and/or pretentious to be caught dead in one of those "underground thingies" or on a bus (god forbid).

Somebody has doctored this, I didn't say that, and I wouldn't say that. Does City Data have any way to respond to people who are obviously trying to distort?
It looks like kyle did that on accident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 11:46 AM
 
1,018 posts, read 1,850,028 times
Reputation: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairobi View Post
Obviously if one has no other options, but it still sucks.



It looks like kyle did that on accident.
OK. I had actually just edited my post to take that possibility into account, guess I was a little quck to react.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 11:52 AM
 
1,018 posts, read 1,850,028 times
Reputation: 761
I think the mistake here is that some posters seem to think of us in either/or, "black and white" terms. If transit isn't always wonderful, it's always awful. If transit isn't ideal for every trip, it's not useful for any trip. I doubt that you all eat the same food at every meal, or wear the same clothes all the time, but somehow mode of travel has to be uniform. I know that not everybody on this thread is saying that, but a number of people are.

I can't imagine that very many frequent transit users would say they use transit for every trip, because even if you're car-free and using transit a lot, you're almost always walking a lot (not to mention the occasional taxi ride).

Costs--$1,000 per year for a transit pass is a small fraction of the cost of maintaining and operating a car (let alone financing it) which typically runs into many thousands. Folks may feel that the car is worth it, but it's not the cheap option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top