Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
My vote would probably go to Northern Idaho, or possibly parts of Maine and Nevada. The southwestern corner of Oregon/northwestern corner of California is also very wild, as well as the Big Bend region of Texas.
I'm guessing he's talking about the least populated/developed.
In our neck of the woods, that title goes to the Okefenokee Swamp area in far Southeast Georgia.
In all my 23 years (no, that's not my age) of living in the state of Georgia, I have never been there, but I have seen the stats. I need to get off the computer and check it out at some point. LOL
Based off of very little certainty and even though they have large enough populations, I would imagine Washington and Oregon seem like a good place to get very lost and go very insane quickly, given the dramatic scenery, rain, and rugged coastlines. It's like an intimidating beauty.
I'm guessing he's talking about the least populated/developed.
In our neck of the woods, that title goes to the Okefenokee Swamp area in far Southeast Georgia.
In all my 23 years (no, that's not my age) of living in the state of Georgia, I have never been there, but I have seen the stats. I need to get off the computer and check it out at some point. LOL
I thought he was talking about wild as in animals and scary nature. Stuff like that...
"The Bob". Bob Marshall Wilderness Area in Western Montana. Very remote, rugged country.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.