Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2015, 09:48 AM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,494,000 times
Reputation: 9263

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by drro View Post
It is the case in Chicago, downtown is generally nice and pretty impressive with its skyscrapers. The neighbourhoods around are just awful with the exception of a few streets and in the far out suburbs it starts to get nice again.
Why are you stuck in the 70s-80s? come on and join us in 2015 where the world is a much better place
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2015, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,353 posts, read 17,022,283 times
Reputation: 12406
Quote:
Originally Posted by one is lonely View Post
I'd argue that pattern is true for huge swaths of the country. It's really only the coasts and a few other places that escape that trend.

In the worst examples, you basically have suburban office parks crammed onto old grids with a handful of historic buildings, with the expectation that people will pay extra for the privilege for living somewhere that provides an "urban experience". It's completely illogical.

The Sun Belt probably does host some of the more extreme cases. Just look at an aerial of Atlanta. You have CNN and the Georgia Dome, and then right next door you can drive down Foundry or Magnolia and witness civilization receding into nothingness. Yet but a few minutes away, the Hilton Garden wants $159 a night for the privilege of staying at its ticky-tacky modern building.

It's absurd.
I suppose it depends upon what you call "urban." Most midwestern cities do have some 19th century residential neighborhoods which survive intact close to Downtown. Of course, because even then the vernacular was detached wood frame, you might not consider examples like this or this, or this particularly urban.

If neighborhoods like that don't do it for you, there are probably only a handful of cities you'd consider to have urban neighborhoods - mostly the big obvious ones, along with smaller cities in the "rowhouse belt" which runs from Philly to Saint Louis.

Last edited by eschaton; 02-02-2015 at 10:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 10:42 AM
 
231 posts, read 394,383 times
Reputation: 325
I'd consider those neighborhoods as urban, though I'd still maintain that the downtowns in those cities are noticeably out of scale with the surroundings (not as egregious as in a city like Atlanta or Phoenix, but not optimum, either). Those neighborhoods were intended to be linked to more modest, early 1900s-style downtowns.

If I'm going to pay a premium to be downtown, I want it to be in the center of desirable urban neighborhoods with good services, and I want strong links between downtown and the neighborhoods. Otherwise, why am I paying a premium? Might as well locate in a suburban office park and avoid the hassles of having modern skyscrapers hooked up to an archaic grid (given the traffic demands of many modern office buildings in areas with poor transit). I think that's why the downtowns underperform in most cities despite the lavish spending of public monies on those areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 11:22 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,467,780 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by one is lonely View Post
I'd argue that pattern is true for huge swaths of the country. It's really only the coasts and a few other places that escape that trend.
For those of us that do live on the coast, it'll help if you'd give an example to illustrate what you have in mind. The places that have dead areas right next to downtown IME don't have a downtown in much demand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 11:43 AM
 
231 posts, read 394,383 times
Reputation: 325
Nei, it's hard to quantify the true demand, but even in Pheonix you have places like Cityscape Residences: CityScape Residences Availability | Downtown Apartments | Phoenix, Arizona . Apparently there's enough "demand" to live in Downtown Phoenix that someone is potentially willing to pay 6 grand or more a month for the privilege. Over 4 grand for a little over 1300 square feet? IN PHOENIX?

"Surround yourself with luxury at CityScape Residences. Situated atop the contemporary 10-story Hotel Palomar, this high-rise apartment tower extends 24 stories above street level, offering a dynamic and exciting location for destination living in the heart of downtown Phoenix. Indulge in the cosmopolitan lifestyle with high-end home finishes, expansive downtown views and full access to 4-star boutique hotel amenities."


Meanwhile, in the Central City neighborhood bordering downtown Phoenix, they can't even keep the homes standing: https://goo.gl/maps/fJcDz . Apparently, it's not dynamic and exciting enough over there.

What shocks me is that cities like Phoenix can get people to pay urban rates for what - in reality - amounts to a suburban office park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 01:02 PM
 
Location: US
645 posts, read 835,211 times
Reputation: 216
This is true for any part of the world not just in US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 01:11 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,467,780 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by hell_storm2004 View Post
This is true for any part of the world not just in US.
No, it's true for European cities. It's not true for many American cities, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 01:17 PM
 
231 posts, read 394,383 times
Reputation: 325
Most of the world adheres to more logical development patterns. Just as an example, I looked up two random Japanese cities that no one talks about, Shizuoka and Kumamoto.

Shizuoka: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...a_shizuoka.JPG
Kumamoto: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...oto_Castle.jpg

Now see, those are urban cores that makes sense. The cores of most auto-dependent American metros are theaters of the absurd in comparison. Downtown Phoenix is no more a real downtown than the frickin' Telecom Corridor in Dallas/Richardson or Southfield, Michigan. The only difference is that the buildings inhabit a historic grid, albeit a grid torn to shreds and abused by modern development patterns.

Part of the problem is that the majority of Americans don't really understand how an urban city is supposed to function. They just see a bunch of tall buildings on a grid and think "OMG ITZ LIKE MANHATTAN!"

Last edited by one is lonely; 02-02-2015 at 01:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 01:22 PM
 
Location: US
645 posts, read 835,211 times
Reputation: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
No, it's true for European cities. It's not true for many American cities, either.
If you think heart of London and Paris rent cost the same as its outskirts, then i think you need to get out more. Right bang in the middle of the city will always be more expensive that any other parts of the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2015, 01:27 PM
 
231 posts, read 394,383 times
Reputation: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by hell_storm
If you think heart of London and Paris rent cost the same as its outskirts, then i think you need to get out more. Right bang in the middle of the city will always be more expensive that any other parts of the city.
Yeah, but does Paris have bordering neighborhoods that are returning to nature? No, instead you see areas that would be considered amazing downtowns in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top