Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2019, 09:38 PM
 
11 posts, read 5,865 times
Reputation: 25

Advertisements

Just curious why there are several states in the Southeast that if you were to go north of you'd be in the midwest. It seems like geographically the more Eastern Midwest states could be considered the Northeast even if they aren't culturally similar. Does this just have to do regions getting named before the US had expanded out west? Thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2019, 09:55 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 3,595,519 times
Reputation: 5055
The Southeast is generally associated with anywhere that you'd hear a Southern accent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2019, 12:52 AM
 
Location: West Seattle
6,374 posts, read 4,989,995 times
Reputation: 8448
I think the real underlying question here is: why does the southern half of the country seem to keep a unified culture as you move west, much longer than the northern half of the country does?

Slavery is probably a major reason. I don't think the Southern states thought of themselves as all that similar until after the Civil War when they all suffered the same economic blow and national humiliation. I think there's even linguistic evidence that (rural) Southern accents are much stronger now than in pre-Civil War times, which is likely a reflection of a stronger regional identity.

Also, the culture that the Northeast is known for is heavily dependent on urbanization and, historically, shipping. That culture obviously can't permeate as far inland as plantation agriculture can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2019, 01:19 AM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,072 posts, read 10,732,474 times
Reputation: 31441
The southeast would be the southern Atlantic coastal states. Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas, and Virginia...not to be confused with the traditional "South", of which it is a part. Since these states must conform to the southwest trend of the Atlantic coast, Atlanta is west of Detroit. Florida extends further westward along the Gulf (Panhandle) because it generally conforms to the boundaries of Spanish (and British) colonial East and West Florida and did not become a state until 1845. Alabama was already established as a state since 1819. The northeast mostly bumps into Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2019, 02:04 AM
 
3,715 posts, read 3,696,275 times
Reputation: 6484
I think a combination of population density and culture. To me, IL is less similar to NY than MS is to FL. Also, it should be noted that the northest extends further east than the southeast does, in other words, you are comparing different starting points, so judging how far west they go in not a fair comparison.

Lastly, for purposes of covering a certain general area, you want you population sizes to be as similar as possible. So if the US gov't needs to have a social security office in each region (just as an example), you want to have somewhat equal population service areas. Given the lower density of the Southeast, they needed to go further west.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2019, 02:32 AM
 
11 posts, read 5,865 times
Reputation: 25
I would think most people nationally and internationally that do not have a interest in geography would think of the US regions as Northeast, Midwest, South and West.

Some articles about how regions get divided:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.bus...-states-2018-5
https://www.businessinsider.com/south-states-usa-2018-5

So is culture, physical geography or population more important when deciding how to divide up regions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2019, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
481 posts, read 422,380 times
Reputation: 891
It's historical/cultural. The south obviously includes mostly Confederate states (obviously with some exceptions), while the northeast is the original 13 colonies NOT in the south, while the "midwest" was, for a while, considered the "northwestern territories", solidifying it as "separate" from the northeast. Over time, each region obviously formed its own identities.

Any sub-categorizations are newer obviously and used as per analytic needs.

Last edited by sad_hotline; 08-02-2019 at 10:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2019, 09:23 PM
 
Location: OC
12,823 posts, read 9,541,088 times
Reputation: 10615
Mississsippi river
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2019, 01:11 AM
 
Location: Chicago
6,359 posts, read 8,826,410 times
Reputation: 5871
Why is there even a United States today? It never would have happened if you didn't have a long coastline on the Atlantic paralleled by the long stretch of the Appalachians. How unique was this piece of land? Well, for starters: can you think of anywhere in the Americas that truly had developed a settler colonial society other than this one spot?

If cities had walls for protection, so did the 13 colonies. Only in such a setting with no exposure to the west could Europeans have been able to "replace" native Americans by sending them packing. That's why the French and Spanish never were able to truly colonize any of their lands while the Brits were (even though neither of those nations had the desire to use America for settlement). The concept of colonial settler society was born in the 13 colonies.

Here's a little tidbit that I am sure many would find interesting: Atlanta became Georgia's capital in 1877. No, that wasn't a typo. I didn't mean to say 1777. Savannah and a few other cities served as the state's capital before that. So Georgia was like Masschhusetts: the largest cities and the state capitals, Savannah and Boston, were both on the Atlantic coast.

So why did a far inland city like Atlanta become not only the state's largest city by far and state capital to boot? And how did it manage to do so with no navigable body of water?

You can't find harbor in Atlanta, but that doesn't mean topography was unkind to it. Its location is a gem. from the northern most tip of colonial America in the Maine portion of Massachusetts all the way south almost to Atlanta, there was no good route to cross the Appalachians. In Atlanta, you could cross it. So when rail replaced boat as the key way to travel west, Atlanta became the Chicago of the South and got into rail road big time. That is why the location was so prime during the Civil War. It can also in part explain why during the rise of the Sun Belt/New South, Atlanta became an air hub and why it was essential for Delta for connections from the eastern seaboard west across the plains that headed towards the Mississippi.

It's all about the Appalachians. It's why Pennsylvania doesn't really relate to Ohio nor Virginia to Kentucky....but Georgia and Alabama cotton up to each other very well.

You can't go without flow. Georgia had it; PA and VA, not so much.

Last edited by edsg25; 08-03-2019 at 01:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2019, 07:57 AM
 
16,690 posts, read 29,506,412 times
Reputation: 7665
Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25 View Post
Why is there even a United States today? It never would have happened if you didn't have a long coastline on the Atlantic paralleled by the long stretch of the Appalachians. How unique was this piece of land? Well, for starters: can you think of anywhere in the Americas that truly had developed a settler colonial society other than this one spot?

If cities had walls for protection, so did the 13 colonies. Only in such a setting with no exposure to the west could Europeans have been able to "replace" native Americans by sending them packing. That's why the French and Spanish never were able to truly colonize any of their lands while the Brits were (even though neither of those nations had the desire to use America for settlement). The concept of colonial settler society was born in the 13 colonies.

Here's a little tidbit that I am sure many would find interesting: Atlanta became Georgia's capital in 1877. No, that wasn't a typo. I didn't mean to say 1777. Savannah and a few other cities served as the state's capital before that. So Georgia was like Masschhusetts: the largest cities and the state capitals, Savannah and Boston, were both on the Atlantic coast.

So why did a far inland city like Atlanta become not only the state's largest city by far and state capital to boot? And how did it manage to do so with no navigable body of water?

You can't find harbor in Atlanta, but that doesn't mean topography was unkind to it. Its location is a gem. from the northern most tip of colonial America in the Maine portion of Massachusetts all the way south almost to Atlanta, there was no good route to cross the Appalachians. In Atlanta, you could cross it. So when rail replaced boat as the key way to travel west, Atlanta became the Chicago of the South and got into rail road big time. That is why the location was so prime during the Civil War. It can also in part explain why during the rise of the Sun Belt/New South, Atlanta became an air hub and why it was essential for Delta for connections from the eastern seaboard west across the plains that headed towards the Mississippi.

It's all about the Appalachians. It's why Pennsylvania doesn't really relate to Ohio nor Virginia to Kentucky....but Georgia and Alabama cotton up to each other very well.

You can't go without flow. Georgia had it; PA and VA, not so much.
Good post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top