Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2009, 08:51 PM
 
2,502 posts, read 8,920,873 times
Reputation: 905

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Around View Post
Of course unemployed people are bound to be unhappy. But I was responding to radraja's premise that things are "better" today because of more material things.

It's not a matter of the have-some vs. have-none as you suggest. It's about have-some vs. have-more.

To my original question, is the average American happier today because he owns 2.3 cars, or was he happier in 1969 when he owned 1.7 cars? Capiche?
That's not exactly what I meant, anyway. I wasn't referring to quantity, I was referring to quality. Decades ago, people may have been happy with their cars....but does that mean that those cars were safe to drive? Today's cars are significantly safer and more eco-friendly. Decades ago, people may have been happy with the medical care they received....but does that mean the quality of care was actually good? Maybe, but not by today's standards.

I don't think that these things necessarily make people happy, since we're so accustomed to having them, but they do provide a better quality of life. There's no question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-01-2009, 10:53 AM
 
6,613 posts, read 16,585,236 times
Reputation: 4787
Quote:
Originally Posted by radraja View Post
That's not exactly what I meant, anyway. I wasn't referring to quantity, I was referring to quality. Decades ago, people may have been happy with their cars....but does that mean that those cars were safe to drive? Today's cars are significantly safer and more eco-friendly. Decades ago, people may have been happy with the medical care they received....but does that mean the quality of care was actually good? Maybe, but not by today's standards.

I don't think that these things necessarily make people happy, since we're so accustomed to having them, but they do provide a better quality of life. There's no question.
Perception is reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top