Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-02-2014, 12:24 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,192,034 times
Reputation: 4407

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleverfield View Post
Wow. Minneapolis gets number 5, but LA, Boston, and Philly only get honorable mentions? What a homer.
You never give up on hating Minny, do you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2014, 12:35 AM
 
Location: Cleveland
3,415 posts, read 5,127,706 times
Reputation: 3088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min-Chi-Cbus View Post
You never give up on hating Minny, do you?
Come on, even you have to admit how much Minnesota homerism there is. Seriously, the poster putting MN above Philadelphia or Boston, 2 of the most historic cities in this nation, both chock full of museum, is just laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 01:28 PM
 
18 posts, read 25,432 times
Reputation: 24
I really wasn't slighting AIC. It is a GREAT museum. The new wing is AMAZING. It is the second largest in terms of gallery space and one of best in world. My point was that MFA Boston is second largest collection in terms of objects art (clearly) (amd third in gallery space). AIC collection is approximately same size as Philly and Harvard. All great museums.


For those who have not been yet the new Harvard Art Museum is a great take and worth a visit on your next trip to Boston.

Also I agree completely with kidphilly about the Philadelphia cultural offerings being superb, which you may remember is what I said in my initial post: That Boston and Philadelphia were better museum cities, top to bottom, than Chicago. This is a point I would continue to maintain even after recently spending 5 days in Chicago ( Though I will agree AIC and Field are ABSOLUTE WORLD CLASS GEMS), and overall Chicago is a world class city for museums. The small museums, history museums and university museums in Boston and Philly are better and give them the edge.

My list goes

very tip top tier.C/N.Y
top tier: Boston/Philly/Chicago
Next Tier: L.A/San Fran etc

But honestly all are really world class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,741 posts, read 6,730,607 times
Reputation: 7590
NY
DC
Chicago
SF
Boston

Philly is not top tier, it's art museum gets fewer visitors than Seattle's, and half as many as Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2015, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,737 posts, read 5,518,049 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
NY
DC
Chicago
SF
Boston

Philly is not top tier, it's art museum gets fewer visitors than Seattle's, and half as many as Boston.
Ha half of Philadelphia is a Museum. I locked my keys in my car outside of Ben Franklins grave last week. Philadelphia history happened here unlike DC were the Federal govt fills up the museums with things from around the country. So I rate your comment a 2/10. Going by your logic Walmart is the best store in America because the most people go there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2015, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,741 posts, read 6,730,607 times
Reputation: 7590
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
Ha half of Philadelphia is a Museum. I locked my keys in my car outside of Ben Franklins grave last week. Philadelphia history happened here unlike DC were the Federal govt fills up the museums with things from around the country. So I rate your comment a 2/10. Going by your logic Walmart is the best store in America because the most people go there.
The question is about museums, not historical sites. Philly has low educational levels, which could be why it's so underwhelming in this regard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2015, 09:22 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,925,770 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
The question is about museums, not historical sites. Philly has low educational levels, which could be why it's so underwhelming in this regard.
yep all uneducated and horrible museums like the barnes, PMA, Franklin Inst, Rodin, Penn Museum, Constitution Museum, Revolutionary War Museum under Const, National Jewish History, National African History, etc.

Even a plethora of smaller interesting museums like Magic Gardens, Mutter, Please Touch etc not worth any time or visit not to mention the many great museums in the area like Brandywine, Michener, or Mercer...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2015, 10:02 AM
 
1,833 posts, read 2,351,798 times
Reputation: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
Ha half of Philadelphia is a Museum. I locked my keys in my car outside of Ben Franklins grave last week. Philadelphia history happened here unlike DC were the Federal govt fills up the museums with things from around the country. So I rate your comment a 2/10. Going by your logic Walmart is the best store in America because the most people go there.
Like some of the muesems in NYC as well. None of that stuff occurred there so what kinda stupid point is that? There are muesems in DC which occurs to what happened there as well same with NYC and other cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2015, 10:44 AM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,169 posts, read 13,249,970 times
Reputation: 10141
Quote:
Originally Posted by nepatz11 View Post
Just to bring some data to my previous point

IN the UNited States the Met has about 13,000 paintings in their collection (and over 2 million "objects of art) by far biggest
The MFA in Boston has 9174 paintings (and 450,000 0bjects) easily second largest
The Harvard Art Museum has 5708 paintings (and 250,000 objects)
The Philadelphia Museum of Art has 4402 paintings (And about 220,000 objects, also no ancient stuff all at PENN)
The National Gallery has 3532 paintings and not sure how many objects but it is NOT encyclopedic collection only has American European and Contemporary
The AIC has 2372 paintings and about 250,000 objects
MOMA in NYC has 2800 paintings AND sculptures (can not search for paintings alone) and 130,000 objects (again not encyclopedic)

So AIC while one of great museums in world is based on objective data, a smaller collection. IT does have second largest building space in North America. West Coast museums not even close in depth and breadth. Source for this is websites of each of these museums. easy to look up if you want to.


No one ever disputed that DC and NYC are clearly top 2.
These numbers are useful as a guide but they do not tell us what is actually in the collections. In other words, it is numbers but not necessarily quality.

The older and larger cities in the 1800s, mostly in the North from say from Boston westward out to Kansas City, began their collections in the 1800s when it was still easy to collect old world masters from Europe or ancient Greek, Roman & Egyptian sculptures. The rise of nationalism has made it harder to collect such international items now.

A good example of this are the huge ancient obelisks called "Cleopatra's Needle". New York, London and Paris all have one that they brought over in the 1800s. It is difficult to imagine today's Egyptian government to allow 3 of its ancient monuments to be transferred out of the country, at least without major protests.

Thus you tend to find more of older and the rarer art works in northern cities like New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee, St Louis and Kansas City. One major exception I know of outside the North is Los Angeles, which I believe was able to catch up by taking over major private collections.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra%27s_Needle (Cleopatra's needle)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William...Art_collection (William Randolph Hearst)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2015, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Montco PA
2,214 posts, read 5,093,832 times
Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
The question is about museums, not historical sites. Philly has low educational levels, which could be why it's so underwhelming in this regard.
What exactly does educational quality in post-industrial America have to do with museum quality? These great museums have been around far longer than bad public education in inner cities. And I'm not sure how you could say the quality of museums in Philadelphia is "underwhelming."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top