Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2015, 05:43 PM
 
231 posts, read 213,604 times
Reputation: 568

Advertisements

An airplane taking off dumps about as much pollution as the average fuel efficient car dumps in a year of daily driving. And we have planes talking off 24/7 all over the world.

A rocket taking off dumps about as much pollution as an airplane taking off daily does in a year.

Choke ... cough ... wheeze.

Asthma, anyone??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2015, 05:56 PM
 
3,804 posts, read 6,178,554 times
Reputation: 3339
For one the best machines we can make aren't that good. The Viking lander sent to discover whether or not there was life on Mars couldn't even find life in Utah during its tests. The rovers sent during the 90s weren't capable of climbing anything more than the gentlest of grades which constrained where they could be sent. Even on Mars a machine has to move slow enough that it won't accidentally get itself destroyed in the 40 or so minutes it takes a signal to go to earth and back.

For two, there's no good reason to send machines. Exploration is inherently dependent on having a living participant. A machine can only gather facts, and it is rather limited in that as discussed above. I support space exploration in service of human colonization, and the only way to learn 100% how a person will interact with a place is to send a person. Even if all you want to do is gather facts a lasting or even temporary human presence will greatly magnify what you can learn because humans can move and react faster, travel further, and explore an area more in depth than any robot we will likely be able to build in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 08:54 PM
 
Location: midwest
1,594 posts, read 1,413,780 times
Reputation: 970
We should have had robots prospecting the Moon for nearly 10 years.

Sending people to Mars is ridiculous.

psik
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top