Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since people such as WildColonialGirl accused me of being paranoid and mentally ill in regards to surgical castration, and since people such as Meyerland appear to believe that birth control is perfect and that birth control never fails other than in cases of user error or in cases of something else nullifying the effectiveness of this birth control, I am asking you this question:
Should doctors who perform failed vasectomies be forced to pay all of their patients' child support for 18+ years afterwards? After all, a doctor who did a sufficiently good job with all of his or her vasectomies would never have any of his or her vasectomies fail and would thus have absolutely nothing to worry about. Plus, forcing a doctor to pay child support for 18+ years after a failed vasectomy certainly seems to be much more humane than forcing a man to pay child support for 18+ years due to a vasectomy failure and due to a broken promise in regards to abortion and/or adoption.
Anyway, any thoughts on this?
While I don't have first hand knowledge, I'm reasonably certain prior to the procedure the patient signs wavier holding harmless physician liability with the results. Not too different than the wavier you sign when going in for major surgery not to sue the doctor for assault for performing the procedure (which strictly speaking from a legal standpoint is what the doctor is committing)
While I don't have first hand knowledge, I'm reasonably certain prior to the procedure the patient signs wavier holding harmless physician liability with the results. Not too different than the wavier you sign when going in for major surgery not to sue the doctor for assault for performing the procedure (which strictly speaking from a legal standpoint is what the doctor is committing)
Can't parts of such waivers theoretically get struck down by judges as being a violation of public policy, though?
I know short answers aren't appropriate here, but in this case it fits. No doctor gives a guarantee any procedure is 100% effective. The odds of pregnancy are low (about 20 of 10,000, more in the first few months after the procedure), but stats still tell patients upfront that it's not a guarantee.
Same thing when a woman gets her tubes tied, my brother's ex wife got pregnant after she had hers tied when her last (she thought) baby was born.
Should the hospital have to pay for your funeral if you die in surgery or your chemo doesn't shrink your tumor? No different to me. You sign everything away in the consent forms anyway, and if you won't sign them they won't do the procedure.
OP, being castrated may have many side effects you have not considered. Specifically:
decreased libido
breast tissue production
hot flashes
emotional instability
night sweats
cognitive problems
etc etc etc. Read some of the posts on prostrate cancer where the people had to have this done. The results can be completely devastating.
So this is a far worse idea then people here seem to realize.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.