Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2020, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Washington State
343 posts, read 352,994 times
Reputation: 1067

Advertisements

OK, since there is an abundance of COVID 19 and mask wearing threads; I'll be very clear about the purpose of this thread. To moderators, let me know if this particular topic has been addressed already.

The question here concerns the legal aspect of mandating masks. The primary concern is: When the pandemic ends, next month or next decade, will the rules about wearing masks ever be rescinded?

Think of every law, rule, policy, and ordinance that has been enacted in response to a threat. Be it war, disease, or corruption; and ask yourself: Has any of these ever been repealed or rescinded after the threat had ended?

It seems once a politician has enacted new policy. It just gets forgotten, forever to be left in place under threat of criminal action.

Thoughts?

 
Old 06-26-2020, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,866,909 times
Reputation: 28563
I would like it if we moved to a model where people who are feeling sick (no matter what kind of sick) would wear masks.

In my last company I worked with an office of mostly people of Chinese descent. And one of my colleagues always wore a mask when he had sniffles or anything else (he spends a lot of time in Taiwan for various reasons, and that was just the norm for him). I didn't think anything of it, but over the past couple months I have talked to more of my East Asian friends, particularly the ones who grew up in Asia or spend more time there, and this was something we talked about. It is a cultural expectation that you should protect others.

I have noticed that I see East Asians locally wearing a mask, and I guess I initially thought they were being extra cautious or paranoid about air quality. And I didn't understand the why. But now that I understand the why, I think it is great idea.

While I don't want to wear masks forever every time I leave the house and in public spaces, I definitely plan to continue, when this is over, to wear one the next time I get the sniffles!
 
Old 06-26-2020, 11:49 AM
 
Location: A Yankee in northeast TN
16,067 posts, read 21,144,062 times
Reputation: 43616
Quote:
Originally Posted by sylentvoyce View Post
The question here concerns the legal aspect of mandating masks. The primary concern is: When the pandemic ends, next month or next decade, will the rules about wearing masks ever be rescinded?
Wearing a mask has a very specific purpose, it helps reduce the spread of contagious disease. Who would benefit, and what would the benefit be, from a requirement to wear masks when there is no longer a threat to the public at large? From the large amount of negative response to maks I don't think this would ever be a case of 'oops, we forgot to take that law off the books'.
 
Old 06-26-2020, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Washington State
343 posts, read 352,994 times
Reputation: 1067
And you're probably right DubbleT. However, these rules can be parlayed into: since masks were proven to flatten the curve against COVID, they are probably useful for every other air born disease as well. Imagine the law evolving into mandatory masks every flu season. Or, we don't know what dangers lurk at all times. We will keep these policies in place because as a progressive and caring society, we always think about the health of others.

The laws may not be forgotten. But there are a dozen ways to keep them relevant for the forseeable future.
 
Old 06-26-2020, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Washington State
343 posts, read 352,994 times
Reputation: 1067
That's not bad personal policy Jade408. The backlash people are having is the fact that it is apparently misdemeanor law in many states and, apparently the governors can enact new misdemeanor laws whenever they please.

What you said about the sniffles is the single most brilliant and eloquent definition of personal freedom and personal responsibility. Something that the United States should hold dear. But it doesn't anymore. Draconian control is apparently the right thing to do these days.
 
Old 06-26-2020, 12:20 PM
 
14,303 posts, read 11,692,440 times
Reputation: 39095
I could see it staying, hypothetically. Let's suppose Covid-19 is miraculously wiped off the face of the earth. Public health officials could say, we noticed that when everyone starting wearing masks, the incidence of influenza went way way down. Flu is a public health hazard. Some people die from flu, and the flu vaccine is only partially effective. If people stop wearing masks, the flu numbers will go up again, so we'd better keep then on.

ETA: I crossposted with the OP. We are thinking the same way.

And...IF there is a Covid vaccine, but it is not 100% effective, I can see not only the public policy staying in place forever but many individuals being firmly determined to wear masks in public for the rest of their lives, no matter what.
 
Old 06-26-2020, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
5,336 posts, read 3,210,678 times
Reputation: 6985
Quote:
Originally Posted by sylentvoyce View Post

It seems once a politician has enacted new policy. It just gets forgotten, forever to be left in place under threat of criminal action.
I think we need to make sure we don't confuse "laws" with "rules" (executive orders, etc.). Will there be a law that we wear masks in perpetuity? No, never. Will some states impose rules longer than other? Most likely.

But hopefully the biggest thing to come out of this is that people can realize that our interactions do have repercussions and we should be alert to germs. I think that there's a misconception that masks are to prevent you from getting sick, when it reality it's the opposite.

As mentioned further up in the thread, someone had a coworker who diligently wore a mask when he got the sniffles. He didn't wear it for his benefit, he wore it for your benefit.

It's really hard to walk the line between turning this into a political thread, but since we're talking laws and rules it inevitably will get there. At some point there has to be leadership that acknowledges the scientific community and if they disagree provide an educated argument. The public had been warned that this was serious and we should be wearing masks and the leaderships response is "We will be open by Easter" which never happened. Here we are and states are mulling closing down again.
 
Old 06-26-2020, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,851 posts, read 5,868,455 times
Reputation: 11467
Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408 View Post
I would like it if we moved to a model where people who are feeling sick (no matter what kind of sick) would wear masks.

In my last company I worked with an office of mostly people of Chinese descent. And one of my colleagues always wore a mask when he had sniffles or anything else (he spends a lot of time in Taiwan for various reasons, and that was just the norm for him). I didn't think anything of it, but over the past couple months I have talked to more of my East Asian friends, particularly the ones who grew up in Asia or spend more time there, and this was something we talked about. It is a cultural expectation that you should protect others.

I have noticed that I see East Asians locally wearing a mask, and I guess I initially thought they were being extra cautious or paranoid about air quality. And I didn't understand the why. But now that I understand the why, I think it is great idea.

While I don't want to wear masks forever every time I leave the house and in public spaces, I definitely plan to continue, when this is over, to wear one the next time I get the sniffles!
Bingo! Agree with this assessment 100%. I have also seen Asians wearing masks well before this pandemic and never knew why, but not I completely understand.

I would love it if people did it naturally. Now, I don't think it will be mandated after the pandemic ends, but out of common courtesy, I wish people would adopt this habit, along with better general hygiene (more frequent hand washing, not coming to work when you are sick, better everyday cleaning habits, etc.).
 
Old 06-26-2020, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Washington State
343 posts, read 352,994 times
Reputation: 1067
That is a fair statement Bosox 15. hopefully these rules don't last in some form in perpetuity. The biggest thing is individual responsibility. As with the poster above I believe in individual responsibility. But that means those people have to understand the importance of protection, but still maintain the freedom to choose.

Many say your freedom stops where my health begins, that's why mask rules are necessary, but I argue on the flip end of the end coin. That our combined freedom allows you to choose to only hang out with people who wear masks. Enforcing rules on others for your comfort or health takes away from that individualism.

Yes. the chief focus of this thread is analyzing rules made by politicians. As such it will inevitably end up getting political. I hope to be active in this thread, to help moderate that a bit.

thank you for your input.
 
Old 06-26-2020, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Washington State
343 posts, read 352,994 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox 15 View Post
I think we need to make sure we don't confuse "laws" with "rules" (executive orders, etc.). Will there be a law that we wear masks in perpetuity? No, never. Will some states impose rules longer than other? Most likely.

But hopefully the biggest thing to come out of this is that people can realize that our interactions do have repercussions and we should be alert to germs. I think that there's a misconception that masks are to prevent you from getting sick, when it reality it's the opposite.

As mentioned further up in the thread, someone had a coworker who diligently wore a mask when he got the sniffles. He didn't wear it for his benefit, he wore it for your benefit.

It's really hard to walk the line between turning this into a political thread, but since we're talking laws and rules it inevitably will get there. At some point there has to be leadership that acknowledges the scientific community and if they disagree provide an educated argument. The public had been warned that this was serious and we should be wearing masks and the leaderships response is "We will be open by Easter" which never happened. Here we are and states are mulling closing down again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saibot View Post
I could see it staying, hypothetically. Let's suppose Covid-19 is miraculously wiped off the face of the earth. Public health officials could say, we noticed that when everyone starting wearing masks, the incidence of influenza went way way down. Flu is a public health hazard. Some people die from flu, and the flu vaccine is only partially effective. If people stop wearing masks, the flu numbers will go up again, so we'd better keep then on.

ETA: I crossposted with the OP. We are thinking the same way.

And...IF there is a Covid vaccine, but it is not 100% effective, I can see not only the public policy staying in place forever but many individuals being firmly determined to wear masks in public for the rest of their lives, no matter what.
Yeah, we do share beliefs. I believe we have crossed paths on past threads before.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top