Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2014, 04:49 PM
 
4,715 posts, read 10,518,260 times
Reputation: 2186

Advertisements

I respectfully disagree, Oil is global commodity, traded on the global market. What isn't as clear cut is REFINED crude into Fuel (Gas/Diesel) and other product. The US is one of, if not the leader in fuel refining in the world - and it was our number #1 export commodity last year. (Unless something at the very end of the year changed) What our Federal Government needs to decide is what/how much are companies should be allowed to export.

I call this accountability and self-preservation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2014, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,432,349 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
About personal windmills, I don't know if you'd want to live in a place that has enough wind to make it worth it.
It doesn't take that much, actually. Wind turbines start generating power when the wind speed is about 10mph. Site evaluations take into account how strong the wind is, as well as how much of the time the wind blows. For example a site that has 12mph wind 35% of the time would be more productive than a site that has 15mph wind 25% of the time.

Quote:
Sorry about the thread hijack, but I wanted to say thank you to all who posted on my negative externalities of wind thread, but it got closed. Thanks anyway though.
Oh, that's OK, I think this one is probably due to be closed soon too, since so many people are posting off topic.

The topic is wind power, for those who lost the thread!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 03:31 AM
 
947 posts, read 1,464,170 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
It doesn't take that much, actually. Wind turbines start generating power when the wind speed is about 10mph. Site evaluations take into account how strong the wind is, as well as how much of the time the wind blows. For example a site that has 12mph wind 35% of the time would be more productive than a site that has 15mph wind 25% of the time.



Oh, that's OK, I think this one is probably due to be closed soon too, since so many people are posting off topic.

The topic is wind power, for those who lost the thread!
Actually that depends upon the turbine. Some turbines only take eight mph others can do it in 7mph. Research is going in the trend of 5mph winds which is pretty much even what you find in most suburbs for most times of the day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,432,349 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by d from birmingham View Post
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakster View Post
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
...
STOP THE HIJACK!

Seriously, this thread is about wind power, not about the Keystone XL pipeline or tarsands oil or Republican oil policies or Alaskan roads, none of which, I feel, even belong in the Green forum, much less in a thread about wind power.

As moms and bartenders the world over have been saying forever, "Take it outside!"

Last edited by OpenD; 02-19-2014 at 11:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 02:02 PM
 
4,715 posts, read 10,518,260 times
Reputation: 2186
Sorry OpenD - Back to breaking wind technology.

I did some more research and there are companies trying to develop wind turbines that will generate power in wind as slow as 2 mph. Now the problem that I have found is that the juice isn't worth the squeeze. Meaning a greater than 30 year ROI. Now granted if it means power vs. no power - the cost will be worth it. But most won't be able to justify spending that kind of money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Interior AK
4,731 posts, read 9,944,608 times
Reputation: 3393
Mod warning: stay on topic or this thread may be closed and infractions issued as appropriate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Interior AK
4,731 posts, read 9,944,608 times
Reputation: 3393
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
In Alaska you'll get a lot of power in the summer and almost none in the winter.
Quite true. Many remote Alaskan homesteads rely entirely on solar in the summer, with minimal (if any) batteries required since the sun never truly sets between late May and early August. However, if these homesteads have year round occupancy, they will usually have a hybrid system consisting of solar, wind, combustion generator and battery bank since the sun only weakly shines for 4 hours in mid-winter. Luckily, one of the big energy suckers -- refrigeration and cooling -- is not required in Alaska in winter

It all depends on where you live in Alaska of course. In some locations (like the wrong side of the mountain) wind or solar may not be an option, or one may completely outstrip the other regardless (like wind on the shoreline). But this is true of any location, the only difference is that Alaska has seasonal climate extremes and more remote areas than the rest of the ConUS; and our landmass is large enough to encompass nearly all climate types from rainforest to desert, maritime to continental.

But in any case, the efficiency of renewable energy systems, and of which type(s), for personal/small-scale generation is dictated by location and circumstance. Hybrid systems tailored to the specific location are generally more successful in areas with seasonal variation or extremes. If you have no way to affordably get grid power, even dodgy wind or solar is better than nothing. In many cases, a properly tailored hybrid system is less expensive than running grid lines to remote locations, and often in locations any significant distance from the grid (i.e. they have to put in a pole or two to reach you).

The big difference is that RE systems tend to be a pay upfront solution, so you see almost the entire full cost in a lump sum; while grid systems tend to be a pay a little now and more forever, so the impact of the full cost is not a large number staring you right in the face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2014, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,432,349 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakster View Post
I did some more research and there are companies trying to develop wind turbines that will generate power in wind as slow as 2 mph. Now the problem that I have found is that the juice isn't worth the squeeze.
Exactly. The problem is not engineering, the problem is physics.

Of course a wind turbine can be engineered to turn at very slow wind speeds, and even generate a little electricity, but the amount of electrical power it can generate will be limited by the amount of energy in the wind. There just isn't a lot of power available in a residential sized wind power unit at 2 mph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2014, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Interior AK
4,731 posts, read 9,944,608 times
Reputation: 3393
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
Exactly. The problem is not engineering, the problem is physics.

Of course a wind turbine can be engineered to turn at very slow wind speeds, and even generate a little electricity, but the amount of electrical power it can generate will be limited by the amount of energy in the wind. There just isn't a lot of power available in a residential sized wind power unit at 2 mph.
I agree that you won't get a huge amount of electricity from low speed wind turbines; but if you have constant/frequent low winds it's usully enough to trickle charge a battery bank if you're being conservative. It would/does help tide PV over on cloudy days and/or allow you to run a combustion generator less in the dark season.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top