Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2019, 04:51 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
That's why coal plants are shutting down. Solar is cheaper, and China gets stuck with the manufacturing pollution.

Wind power will not be really practical until we build a national electrical grid. They have already had to shut down the wind turbines in the Columbia Gorge because the California intertie couldn't accept any more power. We need to be able to ship that power to Chicago.
You are correct that we need a more robust transmission system to fully utilize our wind resource.

https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow...smJTlZEs7lDDvG
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2019, 04:54 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddm2k View Post
The loss for high voltage transmission is too much over that great a distance to deliver any meaningful amount of power. Either corona discharge (due to increasing voltage closer to 1 MV) or simple conductor resistance limits the range of power delivery from the station.

Unless someone designs the equivalent of fiber optics for power delivery with ultra-low resistance, we are stuck with generation at the local and regional levels.
This is incorrect. Long distance transmission of bulk power has been done for years using DC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_DC_Intertie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,727,332 times
Reputation: 6745
This might help some folks understand the US Electrical grid.

The U.S. electrical grid is the largest interconnected machine on Earth. It consists of 450,000 miles of high-voltage transmission lines and 5.5 million miles of local distribution lines, linking thousands of generating plants to factories, homes and businesses.


The U.S. is Connected By One Power Grid - Fact or Myth?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:38 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
That's why coal plants are shutting down. Solar is cheaper,

Solar is not cheaper and it cannot replace a coal, gas or nuclear plant. No matter how many windmills or solar panels you build you will still need to build the same amount of coal, gas and nuclear plants if you have any expectations of reliable power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:17 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Solar is not cheaper and it cannot replace a coal, gas or nuclear plant. No matter how many windmills or solar panels you build you will still need to build the same amount of coal, gas and nuclear plants if you have any expectations of reliable power.
We may need gas for a while. Coal and nuclear are dying a natural death. How much gas we will need depends a lot on technology that is just in the development stage. Battery storage and direct load control via smart meters will likely make significant contributions in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,727,332 times
Reputation: 6745
It's all about Hz's How do you maintain 60 Hz in Chicago when you generation resource is 1000 miles away and has no rotating mass........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:28 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,957,550 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
And nobody's on it, DC. If it wasn't for govt incentives, they wouldn't be doing it at all.


Yes and no. They need the government incentives to compete with the heavily subsidized fossil fuel industry. If it weren't for those subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, it would compete on its own just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,727,332 times
Reputation: 6745
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Yes and no. They need the government incentives to compete with the heavily subsidized fossil fuel industry. If it weren't for those subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, it would compete on its own just fine.
Can you point out how to get those subsidies? We burn lots of coal and it would be a feather in my cap if I could tell the CEO where to get free Gov money
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 08:34 AM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,647,123 times
Reputation: 18905
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/01/...global-energy/


Summary-- right now, wind supplies 0.46% of total human energy consumption per year (solar & tide combined another 0.35%). Note- that's total energy, not just electricity.

To be fair, the article says your quoted small percentages are from 2014, which the article asserts is the most current year of reliable data. I'd guess it has grown since then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 09:04 AM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,259 posts, read 5,131,727 times
Reputation: 17752
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
To be fair, the article says your quoted small percentages are from 2014, which the article asserts is the most current year of reliable data. I'd guess it has grown since then.

You're right-- it has grown-- but 2x not much still isn't very much.


Re: fossil fuel subsidies--


Annual revenue of fossil fuels = ~$135 Billion https://www.statista.com/statistics/...try-in-the-us/



Annual subsidies to fossil fuel industry-- ~$4.7 Billion https://www.treasury.gov/open/Docume...14%20Final.pdf ie ~3% of revenues.




Consumer tax credits alone account for ~10% of wind & solar production costs , and there are other incentives https://www.energy.gov/savings/renew...tax-credit-ptc


But I repeat: that's not the point. Even if renewables were magically free of charge-- we can't do it for logistical reasons except for limited, niche applications.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top