Organic food has no health benefits, study finds; (Maine, Texas, vent)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, I read more than the first paragraph. I read the whole article. The article does not affirm what the title leads you to believe it would. So I'd suggest you read the whole article.
I also looked at their sources cited, and I'm laughing my head off. The Union Of Concerned Scientists is a far-left alarmist organization. You might as well be talking to Al Gore!
Actually, I read more than the first paragraph. I read the whole article. The article does not affirm what the title leads you to believe it would. So I'd suggest you read the whole article.
I also looked at their sources cited, and I'm laughing my head off. The Union Of Concerned Scientists is a far-left alarmist organization. You might as well be talking to Al Gore!
So you read the bit where it says that low dose antibiotics being commonly used to help weight gain?
So that makes it OK?
Hormones are steroids.
Do your fathers cattle walk around outside and graze?
WRONG WRONG WRONG
Hormones are NOT steroids! Hormones are hormones. ARTIFICIAL hormones are steroids.
Again, DISCERNMENT!
And in answer to your leading, irrelevant question, yes my father's cattle are all outside - just like 99.99% of all cattle raised. Of course, if it's raining or hailing or a blizzard, they have the option of going inside.
YOU made the claim that corn-fed beef is the lowest and least efficient conversion.
It is YOUR responsibility to prove your claim. It is not my responsibility to prove it false.
I could just as well claim that you weigh 400 lbs. But if I make such an absurd claim, it would be MY responsibility to prove it. I could also claim that you are a pedophile. But that too would be my responsibility to claim - not your responsibility to claim false.
Hormones are NOT steroids! Hormones are hormones. ARTIFICIAL hormones are steroids.
Again, DISCERNMENT!
And in answer to your leading, irrelevant question, yes my father's cattle are all outside - just like 99.99% of all cattle raised. Of course, if it's raining or hailing or a blizzard, they have the option of going inside.
Jeez you know nothing!
We have naturally produced steroid hormones in our body
So if - as you say - steroids are natural and in every animal's body, what the problem with steroids being in livestock? Keep in mind that's YOUR fallacy, not mine.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
