Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2010, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920

Advertisements

Which general or generals held the highest rank in the history of the United States military? Correct answer will contain only the one or ones and no others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2010, 11:18 AM
 
46 posts, read 100,460 times
Reputation: 44
Grant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Finally escaped The People's Republic of California
11,317 posts, read 8,656,908 times
Reputation: 6391
George C. Marshall, Douglas MacArthur, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Henry "Hap" Arnold and Omar N. Bradley
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
Nope to both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
One qualification - Commander in Chief doesn't count.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Metairie, La.
1,156 posts, read 1,799,930 times
Reputation: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Which general or generals held the highest rank in the history of the United States military? Correct answer will contain only the one or ones and no others.
Trick question since general officers' ranks have proved fluid throughout U.S. history, e.g., five and six-star ranks have not always existed, and various military contingencies allowed brevets and honorary rankings.

I suggest rewording the question to make it more specific. As it is now, it's a broad question asking for a specific answer, and poorly worded at that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiogenesofJackson View Post
Trick question since general officers' ranks have proved fluid throughout U.S. history, e.g., five and six-star ranks have not always existed, and various military contingencies allowed brevets and honorary rankings.

I suggest rewording the question to make it more specific. As it is now, it's a broad question asking for a specific answer, and poorly worded at that.
No trick involved. I'm pretty sure a military historian would be able to provide the correct answer based on how I asked the question. Nobody's even gotten close so far. Keep trying. The standard of "highest" is the current one in official use. However, you are correct that the standard has been modified since the general or generals served in active duty.

Don't get so hung up on stars.

Last edited by CAVA1990; 06-26-2010 at 12:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 12:30 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Washington and Pershing, General of the Armies.

Last edited by ovcatto; 06-26-2010 at 12:39 PM.. Reason: Got it wrong the first time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
Ovcatto you are (finally) correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 12:39 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Nice explanation (though I don't believe it's accurate) but you have not provided the correct answer. Neither Grant nor Sherman is part of it.
See the edit. The whole thing is so convoluted as to be almost incomprehensible (well at least to my addled mind).

U.S. Army Five-Star Generals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top