Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What Do You Believe Are the World's Most Negative Events?
The Russian Revolution of 1917 and in Particular the October Revolution 27 42.86%
The French Revolution 3 4.76%
Hitler's Accession to Power in 1933 30 47.62%
The American Revolution 1 1.59%
England's Glorious Revolution of 1689 0 0%
September 11, 2001 9 14.29%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2019, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,756,035 times
Reputation: 15354

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Why do so many posters romance totalitarian or brutal methods of spurring development, when freedom, neutral courts, and clear demarcation of property rights would accomplish a better result with no concomitant slaughter?
Thanks for this thread. It's been fascinating watching people defending this sort of horror in a contemporary ideological context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:57 PM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,268 posts, read 5,147,374 times
Reputation: 17774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Way Resident View Post
…. Without the USSR, the European theater would have played out differently during WW2.

.

The Russian winter beat the Germans, not the USSR. Without the USSR, WWII would have ended 6 weeks earlier. Patton wouldn't have been ordered to slow down to wait for the Russians to take Berlin.


Socialism/communism can only exist under totalitarianism. Central planning requires that everyone follow the same set of directives. Pluralism would allow a constant bickering and change of plans as each election would potentially change the govt. plan.


Keep in mind that MotherNature favors pluralism & capitalism-- constant new start-ups, so to speak, guarantee that someone will always be successful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:59 PM
 
Location: London
4,709 posts, read 5,068,175 times
Reputation: 2154
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
I conclude that the Russian Revolution, along with Hitler's accession to his role as Chancellor and Fuehrer were among the world's great tragedies.
Nazism was a tragedy as it was inherently flawed. However the Russian revolution was not, it was just badly manged with those running it unable to understand what they were doing and how to achieve what they wanted. The USSR ended up with state capitalism, which was far from the teachings of Karl Marx, who was an economist not a politician. The Soviets were unable to give a fair distribution of the nations productivity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:02 PM
 
Location: London
4,709 posts, read 5,068,175 times
Reputation: 2154
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
The Russian winter beat the Germans, not the USSR. Without the USSR, WWII would have ended 6 weeks earlier. Patton wouldn't have been ordered to slow down to wait for the Russians to take Berlin.
I think you have been watching too many B movies from Hollywood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:09 PM
 
Location: London
4,709 posts, read 5,068,175 times
Reputation: 2154
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
clear demarcation of property rights would accomplish a better result
Property (land) has been the problem with the version of capitalism we used. Its Achilles heel. A large part of a communities economy soaks into land (hence where the land values come from), which is collectively created. This is appropriated by the landowners, who did not create that value, not reclaimed to pay for common services. This creates a trickle up economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 07:28 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,084 posts, read 17,043,458 times
Reputation: 30247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fifty Seven View Post
Thanks for this thread. It's been fascinating watching people defending this sort of horror in a contemporary ideological context.
This thread has been both an education and a moment of great moral clarity. People prefer a Utopian ideal to actual lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 09:41 PM
 
1,412 posts, read 1,085,720 times
Reputation: 2953
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
As I suspected, as a Princeton professor, solidly of the academic establishment.
Wait... So going to an Ivy league school lends your favorite journalist credibility but discredits the actual historian who happens to disagree with you?

Interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2019, 02:42 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,084 posts, read 17,043,458 times
Reputation: 30247
Quote:
Originally Posted by history nerd View Post
Wait... So going to an Ivy league school lends your favorite journalist credibility but discredits the actual historian who happens to disagree with you?

Interesting.
Not trying to be obtuse by who is my "favorite Journalist" If you are thinking of Ben Shapiro he is not and this is off-topic. As far as the Princeton professor I am attacking the "group-think" and romanticizing of Utopian ideals. What they don't teach in the schools is as beautiful as they are they don't work. Would you sanely trust policy to day-campers and their counselors turning "Where Have All the Flowers Gone" into policy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2019, 10:09 AM
 
2,362 posts, read 1,925,727 times
Reputation: 4724
Hitler lopsided that list...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2019, 11:51 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,084 posts, read 17,043,458 times
Reputation: 30247
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky2balive View Post
Hitler lopsided that list...
I wouldn't say 25 vs. 20 is "lopsided." There are good arguments for both; Hitler was responsible for more deaths over a shorter period and Stalin was responsible indirectly for a greater number of deaths over a longer period. Think the Korean and Vietnam wars, in which Russia was not directly involved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top