Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2009, 02:42 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,157,635 times
Reputation: 46685

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
The Moghul Empire never extended over even a quarter of the territory of the present Russian Federation, nor did it rule over more people that today's Russia.

The USSR was almost certainly the largest part of the globe to ever be within the confines of influence of a single ruler.. The British Empire including Canada, India and Australia would probably come in second.
Actually, at its apogee, 25% of the world's land was under the British flag.

That being said, I think the definition of "Superpower" is a little dicey. What makes a country a Superpower? It has to be much more than sheer military might, as the ultimate fragility of the Soviet Union showed us. Are you really a superpower when you collapse so quickly? Instead, I think a Superpower has to be that way through a combination of factors: Economics, Military, Culture, and the political will to project power.

I think Britain certainly had the title from the early 18th Century through World War I, for it was the center of the political and economic world. Perhaps even to the Independence of India.

Rome? No question.

The Abassids are worth a mention.

One or two Chinese dynastics would likely be candidates, except for the fact that they really never were keen on projecting power past their borders.

The Mongols? I'm skeptical, because there was nothing lasting from their conquests.

The Spanish? Probably a good candidate.

The Alexandrine Greeks? Well, since his conquered lands quickly split up into three different entities, I'm not sure you can say that about them either.

Last edited by cpg35223; 12-10-2009 at 02:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2009, 06:46 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Qin China and later Han China were superpowers of their day, both had populations and territories that could rival even Rome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2009, 07:02 PM
 
1,308 posts, read 2,865,653 times
Reputation: 641
The mongol empire in the 13th century including most of russia, china, korea, mongolia, and signficant portions of the Middle East (and Persia and India I believe). It was short lived in most of those areas, however. And its influence was limited because it never truly developed a powerful cultural influence, adapting the culture of those that it ruled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2009, 08:34 PM
 
Location: Murphy, TX
673 posts, read 3,091,122 times
Reputation: 511
I think the Mongol Empire definitely was super power in itsheight, lasting about 100-150 years or so. It may have been short period but Mongols even reached border of central Europe (see Mongol invasion of Europe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). Mongol Empire most definitely was most power country at that period and was capable of projecting power through out the world. They even fought the Egyptian Mamluks for the middle east.

The Mongol Empire may have broken up, but they left a lasting influence. Russia was under Mongol control for 100s of years even after the main empire split up. Even after it end, there many Mongol invasions by their descends. Timur the lame created a pretty big empire in the middle east. Not mention the Mughal empire in India was also founded by descends of the Mongols. A lots of people in Asia have Mongol blood in them due their huge conquests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2009, 08:37 PM
 
1,308 posts, read 2,865,653 times
Reputation: 641
The mongol empire was huge, but fairly shortly after its creation it split into seperate pieces. Only for a brief period after the death of Ghengis Khan was it united under a single ruler.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2009, 07:38 AM
 
1,461 posts, read 1,529,180 times
Reputation: 790
The Ottoman Empire, from the gates of Vienna, to the Persian Gulf, to the Red Sea and most of northern Africa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2009, 08:02 PM
 
1,308 posts, read 2,865,653 times
Reputation: 641
Although its true authority in North Africa is debateable. Even in Egypt local rulers commonly had as much authority as the sultan and this is even more true of the rest of the region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2009, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,114 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelogannator123 View Post
Throughout history which nations have been true Superpowers of their time? I know that now America is, and that not long ago the Soviet Union was, but what about before that?

The English speaking people have ruled the seas for a 1,000 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2009, 09:18 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
The English speaking people have ruled the seas for a 1,000 years.
No. Britain only came to rule the waves after they broke the Spanish Armada. Before the Spain and Portugal ruled the seas. Thus why the Pope sanctioned the Treaty of Tordesillas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:41 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,114 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
No. Britain only came to rule the waves after they broke the Spanish Armada. Before the Spain and Portugal ruled the seas. Thus why the Pope sanctioned the Treaty of Tordesillas.

According to you logic the English had a weak navy the day before "they broke the back of the Spanish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top