Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-29-2020, 05:28 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14286

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanQuest View Post
By Brent Kendall and Michelle Hackman
Updated Feb. 28, 2020 3:13 pm ET
A federal appeals court ruled the Trump administration must halt a policy of returning migrants along the southern U.S. border to Mexico while their requests for asylum in the U.S. are considered.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, on Friday ruled the policy was inconsistent with federal immigration law and U.S. international treaty obligations not to return aliens to countries where their life or freedom would be threatened due to their race, religion, nationality, or political or social affiliations.

The court, in its 2-to-1 ruling, said its decision applied to the entire southern U.S. border.

The ruling is a considerable setback for the Trump administration because it said the remain-in-Mexico policy was one of its most effective in slowing the wave of asylum seekers arriving at the southern border from Central America and elsewhere. Illegal border crossings have fallen more than 75% since their peak in May, around the time when the administration vastly expanded “Remain in Mexico” along the border.

The administration could choose to seek emergency intervention at the Supreme Court, as it has in other immigration cases when it lost in the lower courts.


Immigration and the courts, what a roller coaster.

Is it me or should we question the viability of the 9th Circuit related to illegal immigration actions related to POTUS? A clear pattern of SCOTUS overturning them on this issue is beginning to look like a breach of the 9ths constitutional duties. Perhaps they should be stripped of their authority to invoke nationwide injunctions on the issue until they get their act together.

Illegals are not supposed to be here, period. No US citizen can reasonably assert that they are being damaged in some way because the nation is enforcing the illegal immigration law. They either should erase the borders or plug their holes. And if they do, they should be lined up, the second they call on the military to save their sorry arses in the aftermath.

The ACLU should concern themselves with Americans getting the shaft from outsourcing, unfair trade deals, the rich being able to hide trillions offshore, Silicon Valley having a workforce that is only 2% black, despite having corporations among them worth over a trillion $$. Isn’t it a civil liberty to not have the planet turn into a cesspool? How about what the drug war did to this country. Where was the ACLU and the 9th circuit?

This country is a hypocritical oaf. No wonder the liberals don’t mind the rich getting richer. They seem to be the group where the wealthy absolutely hold the vessels of power. If certain conservatives would calm the f down about US citizen black people and women, it would be over for the two faced liberals.
"The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco," which is where the dems alway run to.

Thankfully it is about to end as trump replaces more of their judges.

"in its 2-to-1 ruling", which will be overturned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-29-2020, 05:32 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galvatron99 View Post
Wow, this is the best news ever! If they are seeking asylum here, then they should be allowed to stay here.
" If they are seeking asylum here, then they should be allowed to stay here."

Emphasis on "SEEKING". Does NOT mean they will NOR should succeed.

"then they should be allowed to stay here." Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Seacoast NH
1,746 posts, read 880,455 times
Reputation: 1878
https://www.yahoo.com/news/court-blo...055153712.html


"A federal appeals court in California on Friday initially blocked a centerpiece of the Trump administration's network of restrictive policies at the southern border, ordering officials there to stop sending asylum-seekers to Mexico, where tens of thousands of Latin American migrants returned by the U.S. have been stranded for months.

But later on Friday, the same court temporarily paused its own order, granting an emergency request filed by Trump administration lawyers who rushed to defend the controversial Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program. "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 07:59 AM
 
1,378 posts, read 737,960 times
Reputation: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaryoVilla View Post
Can we have them stay at your house? Whats your address? Can you give them allowance too, to feed 15 of their kids? Please...I feel bad for these people...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaryoVilla View Post
Speak for yourself, this country is my house...I defended it and sacrificed 30 years of my life for it..

and you?
Oh this is probably the dumbest argument that I have ever heard. If you want them gone so bad, then you can pony up the millions of dollars of your own personal money to do it.

And no a country is not a house, the laws defining both are different. I could care less what you did for 30 years, that was your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 08:04 AM
 
1,378 posts, read 737,960 times
Reputation: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
southern border is a great place to bring in coronavirus patients. Dems want it wide open.
Oh yeah because that wide open north border wouldn't be tempting at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,502 posts, read 17,250,696 times
Reputation: 35800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galvatron99 View Post
Wow, this is the best news ever! If they are seeking asylum here, then they should be allowed to stay here.



Tens of thousands "asylum seekers" walk through other countries to reach America to claim asylum and this is wrong. If there is a war or something happening in Nicarugua then should people fleeing the violence be allowed to bypass the safer countries of Honduras, El salvador, Guatemala etc.. just to reach America, a country they know will hand out everything they want? We all know that they are taking advantage of our gullible generosity.

The backlog from these asylum seekers is ridiculous and it can take many months for their case to be heard which means they are either detained at the border or are set free and allowed to roam the country with only a promise that they will return for their hearing.

How many actually return and how many just disappear into our country?





The Democrats with their feel good policies will be our great undoing and it all comes down to the fact that no one wants to be the "bad guy" that actually enforces our immigration laws.



What is really odd is the Dems tell us that America is a horrible terrible place full of racism and all other "isms" yet the world would gladly come here for the handouts. I don't get it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 08:36 AM
 
62,974 posts, read 29,170,163 times
Reputation: 18595
I'm glad that this initial ruling has been suspended for now so that the Supreme Court can take it on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 09:17 AM
 
78 posts, read 45,804 times
Reputation: 66
Here we go again activist judges will have their case reversed in the supreme Court
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 09:23 AM
 
62,974 posts, read 29,170,163 times
Reputation: 18595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cartwheelmaster View Post
Here we go again activist judges will have their case reversed in the supreme Court
Yep, when will they ever learn?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2020, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,641 posts, read 18,249,084 times
Reputation: 34520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I'm glad that this initial ruling has been suspended for now so that the Supreme Court can take it on.
And let's be clear. Without the Supreme Court regularly bench slapping courts for failing to halt their rulings in contentious cases like this whole the government appeals, I'm skeptical that the 9th Circuit would have done so here. So yet another win for our president via his federal court appointees and another win for our country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top