Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-17-2009, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,466,589 times
Reputation: 4586

Advertisements

islandpacket.com | State employment verification law takes effect July 1

Quote:
A new state law that goes into effect July 1 will require private businesses with more than 100 employees to verify the residency status of their workers or face fines and loss of their business licenses.

The law, called the S.C. Illegal Immigration Reform Act, was signed by Gov. Mark Sanford last year to discourage undocumented workers from migrating to the Palmetto State.It requires employers to verify residency on new employees within five days of the hire. Public offices and private companies with more than 500 employees were required to comply with the new law beginning Jan. 1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2009, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis, MN
10,244 posts, read 16,377,717 times
Reputation: 5309
It seems silly to give employers the choice of either submitting information to the federal E-Verify system or proving to the SC Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation that the employees already have or could legally obtain a S.C. driver's license. What employer in their right mind would go through all of that trouble with the SC Department of labor? Any intelligent employers is going to do E-Verify since it is way easier. Those who have access codes can check groups of 5-10 employees at a time and the turnaround time is usually a few minutes at most. Also, shouldn't most employers nationwide be using E-Verify anyway? My company has already been using it for a while now and it isn't perfect, but is definitely more effective than former methods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2009, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Where laws can be ignored due to political correctness
1,111 posts, read 1,852,992 times
Reputation: 270
Quote:
A new state law that goes into effect July 1 will require private businesses with more than 100 employees to verify the residency status of their workers or face fines and loss of their business licenses.
More than 100? I have a feeling that many blue-collar businesses may be receiving a free pass on verifying employee legal statuses.

It's a good start anyway but it needs to include ALL businesses regardless of the amount of employees hired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2009, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Maryland
15,171 posts, read 18,567,467 times
Reputation: 3044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slig View Post
It seems silly to give employers the choice of either submitting information to the federal E-Verify system or proving to the SC Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation that the employees already have or could legally obtain a S.C. driver's license. What employer in their right mind would go through all of that trouble with the SC Department of labor? Any intelligent employers is going to do E-Verify since it is way easier. Those who have access codes can check groups of 5-10 employees at a time and the turnaround time is usually a few minutes at most. Also, shouldn't most employers nationwide be using E-Verify anyway? My company has already been using it for a while now and it isn't perfect, but is definitely more effective than former methods.
But, pro-illegal organizations and the ACLU oppose E-Verify, because it IS an effective method to determine employment eligibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2009, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, MN
10,244 posts, read 16,377,717 times
Reputation: 5309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar View Post
But, pro-illegal organizations and the ACLU oppose E-Verify, because it IS an effective method to determine employment eligibility.
Great, but the ACLU doesn't fine us, while the Department of Labor potentially does...so the DoL's wishes take precedent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2009, 04:03 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,316 posts, read 47,069,940 times
Reputation: 34088
Any business that can do electronic transactions should be forced to use E-verify or have their license revoked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2009, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Maryland
15,171 posts, read 18,567,467 times
Reputation: 3044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slig View Post
Great, but the ACLU doesn't fine us, while the Department of Labor potentially does...so the DoL's wishes take precedent.
Yes, we all know that; and it wasn’t the point of my comments. I mentioned it to underscore the fact that they want illegal aliens to continue to work. Otherwise, they wouldn’t oppose E-Verify.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top