Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav
that maybe governamnt's reson but nopt individuals purpose at all. They created IRA's after thwe 70's recession because for one thign retil investors dd not return tot eh markets to any degree. Its like we are seeig now as they keep cash o the sidelines from main street to wall street.
|
IOW the creation of IRAs/401ks(?) has run its
saturated course? Now what's needed is for the consumer to do both—invest in the market & copiously consume with deflating wages? The consumer is worn-out via FIRE, price, healthcare & education INFLATION. The financial apparatus/Big Business didn't engineer the
investor-consumer concept correctly,
they wanted it all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robyn55
{from WSJ article?}The danger for rank-and-file workers, whose account balances typically fall under the proposed cap, is that the people who would be among the most affected by it—business owners and other successful investors—could disband 401(k) plans for all employees and move money into other tax-sheltered tools, retirement-industry experts say…
…FWIW - I'm a retired employer who terminated my firm's (very generous) qualified defined contribution pension and profit sharing plans in the 1990's when the plans no longer were advantageous to me personally in terms of my retirement savings (as a result of new government rules). So I wouldn't rule out this type of behavior on the part of employers. Robyn
|
These quotes further explain the unintended consequences of tax-deferred/other-type retirement accounts. Sorry about that Robyn55.
![Tape](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/tape.gif)