Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which would you rather own?
One share of AMZN & about $50 6 31.58%
Two shares each of MSFT and WMT, and one share each of GOOGL and AAPL 13 68.42%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2018, 01:11 PM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,883,560 times
Reputation: 2295

Advertisements

Pile two is mostly google. Great company, reasonable valuation if the share structure was normal, completely intolerable share structure, no dividend and share count going the wrong way. Your share gets no capital return and is irrelevant to someone looking for control due to the dual structure - what actual benefit do you get as a shareholder except the hope someone will buy it off you for more later? Google shares are almost closer to a collectible than an investment.

WMT and MSFT are overvalued on top of that.

Pile one is AMZN which again, great company, not worth what it is trading at.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Cool story when people talk about 10 baggers it’s kind of easy just to skip past it as it’s pretty uncommon or accompanied by larger losses. A good old internet love story
Exactly. I do 1.5-2x baggers pretty frequently but also not infrequently will lose 50% trying to catch a falling knife. The aggregate performance is good but looks much more like the S&P and much less like the home runs. For every person who takes the risk of inadequate diversification and then hits that kind of home run without an offsetting loss there is someone effectively bankrupting themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2018, 06:15 PM
 
11,610 posts, read 10,435,692 times
Reputation: 7217
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity View Post
Exactly. I do 1.5-2x baggers pretty frequently but also not infrequently will lose 50% trying to catch a falling knife. The aggregate performance is good but looks much more like the S&P and much less like the home runs. For every person who takes the risk of inadequate diversification and then hits that kind of home run without an offsetting loss there is someone effectively bankrupting themselves.
By 1.5-2 baggers, do you mean 50 to 100 percent, or 150 to 200 percent gains?

What are some of your current holdings that you expect to be 1.5-2 baggers? Over what time period?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2018, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,945 posts, read 12,285,067 times
Reputation: 16109
I spent 30 minutes trying to find an ETF with all the stocks listed that the OP could invest in but couldn't find one that included WMT also because WMT is in more consumer retail based funds and not many funds mix WMT with AMZN and MSFT.

The only fund I could find that has a low expense ratio with most of the OP's stocks is the QQQ.. the tracking ETF for the nasdaq 100 index. Expense ratio .2%. I had a different one listed here then realized it didn't have AMZN in it.

Here's a link to the top holdings in the QQQ ETF:
http://etfdb.com/etf/QQQ/

Here's the one I originally posted with the .08% expense ratio:
http://etfdb.com/etf/FTEC/

I think the inclusion of great names like NVDA, V, and MC make it a better choice than the QQQ.. you don't need to own AMZN, OP.

Last edited by sholomar; 05-19-2018 at 08:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2018, 08:32 PM
 
8,943 posts, read 11,782,627 times
Reputation: 10871
None. The spectacular growth period for those stocks are over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2018, 10:49 PM
 
24,407 posts, read 26,951,108 times
Reputation: 19977
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidt1 View Post
None. The spectacular growth period for those stocks are over.
Thats what people been saying since 2009
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2018, 11:07 PM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,883,560 times
Reputation: 2295
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRnative View Post
By 1.5-2 baggers, do you mean 50 to 100 percent, or 150 to 200 percent gains?

What are some of your current holdings that you expect to be 1.5-2 baggers? Over what time period?
The former.

My next double is probably going to be Macy's (M). My cost basis is about $20, reasonable chance it hits $40 given the sheer amount of cash it throws off, good quarter, and the short interest getting squeezed out. That said it's not a slam dunk at the current price of $34. Bought less than a year ago - I'm perfectly happy collecting the dividend so wherever the stock goes I'm cool as long as the business performs and they keep paying out cash, but I'll sell at the long term capital gains mark if the price hits $45 or I see a compellingly better opportunity (have a bias against churn).

Granted for every dollar I'm up on Macy's I'm down sixty cents or so on CBL which goes to the whole portfolio vs. single stock thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 08:37 AM
 
11,610 posts, read 10,435,692 times
Reputation: 7217
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity View Post
The former.

My next double is probably going to be Macy's (M). My cost basis is about $20, reasonable chance it hits $40 given the sheer amount of cash it throws off, good quarter, and the short interest getting squeezed out. That said it's not a slam dunk at the current price of $34. Bought less than a year ago - I'm perfectly happy collecting the dividend so wherever the stock goes I'm cool as long as the business performs and they keep paying out cash, but I'll sell at the long term capital gains mark if the price hits $45 or I see a compellingly better opportunity (have a bias against churn).

Granted for every dollar I'm up on Macy's I'm down sixty cents or so on CBL which goes to the whole portfolio vs. single stock thing.
I own some Macy's, waiting for it to get long term. At current prices, my retail gamble is Bed, Bath & Beyond (BBBY). And I think Micron (MU) may outperform anything else that I own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 09:43 AM
 
24,407 posts, read 26,951,108 times
Reputation: 19977
I honestly believe BBBY is a company that will go bankrupt or get bought for cheap
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 09:44 AM
 
11,610 posts, read 10,435,692 times
Reputation: 7217
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
I honestly believe BBBY is a company that will go bankrupt or get bought for cheap
Always a possibility, but this is a remote possibility for the immediate future. BBBY is profitable (2018 guidance $2/sh. +) and no debt is due within five years. Cash flow/sh. is over $4.50/sh.

Here's another scenario. AMZN's stock price collapses as AWS margins fall and market share loss accelerates as MSFT, GOOGL and ORCL target AWS. AMZN no longer can subsidize its retail operations, and raises prices.

Meanwhile, BBBY continues to reform its business model to better compete with AMZN. BBBY now trades below book value, yields close to 4 percent, and it trades at one-half its 52-week high. BBBY is cheap now.

Macy's and other department stores were able to find their sea legs against AMZN. This may be a much easier task for a more focused and category-killer such as BBBY. The likes of Macy's may reduce/eliminate home goods given the fierce competitive environment.

Analysts are very negative on BBBY (a positive?). BBBY scares me, but that often is a good sign. Macy's scared me greatly when I was buying it under $20 less than a year ago. I didn't buy sufficient shares of M then, and I likely haven't bought sufficient shares of BBBY now.

M still scares me, but for many of the same reasons that BBBY scares me (AMZN onslaught).

Any good news for BBBY may result in a quick 33 percent pop. BBBY has sold over $24 every year for the last 12 years.

Last edited by WRnative; 05-21-2018 at 09:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,945 posts, read 12,285,067 times
Reputation: 16109
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRnative View Post
Always a possibility, but this is a remote possibility for the immediate future. BBBY is profitable (2018 guidance $2/sh. +) and no debt is due within five years. Cash flow/sh. is over $4.50/sh.

Here's another scenario. AMZN's stock price collapses as AWS margins fall and market share loss accelerates as MSFT, GOOGL and ORCL target AWS. AMZN no longer can subsidize its retail operations, and raises prices.

Meanwhile, BBBY continues to reform its business model to better compete with AMZN. BBBY now trades below book value, yields close to 4 percent, and it trades at one-half its 52-week high. BBBY is cheap now.

Macy's and other department stores were able to find their sea legs against AMZN. This may be a much easier task for a more focused and category-killer such as BBBY. The likes of Macy's may reduce/eliminate home goods given the fierce competitive environment.

Analysts are very negative on BBBY (a positive?). BBBY scares me, but that often is a good sign. Macy's scared me greatly when I was buying it under $20 less than a year ago. I didn't buy sufficient shares of M then, and I likely haven't bought sufficient shares of BBBY now.

M still scares me, but for many of the same reasons that BBBY scares me (AMZN onslaught).

Any good news for BBBY may result in a quick 33 percent pop. BBBY has sold over $24 every year for the last 12 years.
I like your thinking. I just bought some MTCH today. I believe theyll be able to better monetize the dating sites they own (most of the major ones)and keep growing renevues and profits and it also has a very large short position. I have BBBY on my watchlist but unless they can grow their revenues I dont see the stock going anywhere. The company bought back a bunch of their shares at higher prices. Its amazing how cheap a value stock can get and how expensive growth stocks can get... The market really punishes you if you dont grow or are in unpopular sectors (airlines, automakers, insurers)

MU is cheap if their earnings keep up.. The semiconductor sector tends to be very cyclical and the stock will get punished if RAM prices decline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top