Lifecycle Funds vs Choosing your own asset allocation??? (invest, income, stocks)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you just want to set it and leave it alone then a Target Retirement fund is better then a Life Cycle fund. Target Retirements adjust the Asset Allocation the nearer the fund comes to it's retirement date while the Life Cycle funds have a fairly constant allocation.
If you prefer to take an active part (as I do) in your portfolio you choose your own asset allocation re balancing according to your plan.
What's wrong with doing both? I have a large chunk of my portfolio in individual stocks but i am now putting more of my present income into Target retirement funds. Why? Because I don't have the time to watch the stocks every day so why not invest in a fund and let someone do it for you? We'll see which of us do better, me or the fund manager!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.