[Kevroqs]

Originally Posted by Katie the heartbreaker

Marijuana is now legal in Nevada, so someone should be able to use it without fear that they cannot get a job. It is no different than alcohol. If you are impaired by either while you are working, you will still lose your job. If someone uses a little marijuana or drinks a few beers each night, and goes to work sober the next day, what is the problem? Employers have no business knowing what you do on your off time as long is it does not affect your work performance.

People who are intoxicated or high on marijuana should not report to their job, especially if they operate motor vehicles or heavy machinery

[emm74]

Originally Posted by Kevroqs

Leftists: "Every vote should be counted"

Also Leftists: "People living in Montana or Wyoming should not have equal representation"

Complete lie. People who think the EC should be eliminated believe that people living in Montana and Wyoming should not have MORE representation.

[Cold Warrior]

Originally Posted by Katie the heartbreaker

Marijuana is now legal in Nevada, so someone should be able to use it without fear that they cannot get a job. It is no different than alcohol. If you are impaired by either while you are working, you will still lose your job. If someone uses a little marijuana or drinks a few beers each night, and goes to work sober the next day, what is the problem? Employers have no business knowing what you do on your off time as long is it does not affect your work performance.

Schedule I

Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are:

heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote

[BBMW]

If you want to see the reason the electoral college needs to stay, look at the map below. This is the county by county results of the election. Note that Clinton got the popular majority.



Without the electoral college system, a very small part of the country will control the whole thing. If that happens, large swaths of the country will decide to split off (or eject the small, densely populated areas on the coasts)

[Kevroqs]

Originally Posted by lvmensch

As I have repeatedly pointed out the real problem is the Senate not the Electoral College. That is what will eventually bring the thing to a head. why on earth should a Wyoming or Rhode Island voter have 30 times as much control on the Senate decision as a Californian.

So states can have equal representation.



Los Angeles County (red) has more population than all of the states in blue. Why should they get to dictate over those living outside it?

[lvmensch]

Originally Posted by BBMW

If you want to see the reason the electoral college needs to stay, look at the map below. This is the county by county results of the election. Note that Clinton got the popular majority.

Which conclusively demonstrates that the vast empty spaces prefers Trump. Why is that relevant?

You believe cow pies are more important than voters?

[emm74]

Originally Posted by lvmensch

Which conclusively demonstrates that the vast empty spaces prefers Trump. Why is that relevant?

You believe cow pies are more important than voters?

As long as the cow pies vote red, yes, that's all the care about. Actual living people who vote blue are lower than cow pies to many on the right.

[Kevroqs]

Originally Posted by emm74

Complete lie. People who think the EC should be eliminated believe that people living in Montana and Wyoming should not have MORE representation.

California's population is nearly at 40 million, and Wyoming is about half a million. The EC provides a balance of representation, based on the number of Senators and Representatives. It's a shame that schools don't teach this stuff.

[emm74]

Originally Posted by Kevroqs

California's population is nearly at 40 million, and Wyoming is about half a million. The EC provides a balance of representation, based on the number of Senators and Representatives. It's a shame that schools don't teach this stuff.

Yes, it is a shame that schools no longer teach logic and communication but I guess I can see living proof that they don't.

[Kevroqs]

Originally Posted by emm74

Yes, it is a shame that schools no longer teach logic and communication but I guess I can see living proof that they don't.

Because Hillary supporters bitter about her loss want to change the rules so they can win every time.