Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL the vaccine does absolutely NOTHING to prevent transmission. NOTHING. If you cant see that you are either blind or brainwashed. It was an epic fail on that front yet still some are being forced to take it or be fired.
Now they just moved the goal posts to "if you take the vaccine you wont get it as bad". There is no way to even possibly prove that claim. Ridiculous.
The vaccine protects people from ending up in a hospital or deceased just like any other vaccine. Yes medical scientists indicate the vaccine will lessen the impact if you fo contract it but you know better than John’s Hopkins or many of the other research hospitals, you should consider publishing a paper with your research.
The vaccine protects people from ending up in a hospital or deceased just like any other vaccine. Yes medical scientists indicate the vaccine will lessen the impact if you fo contract it but you know better than John’s Hopkins or many of the other research hospitals, you should consider publishing a paper with your research.
No way you can possibly prove that. It's not possible. There is zero way you or any doctor can tell if it's the vaccine lessened the symptoms or someone's immune system just fought it off, as the VAST majority of those that contracted COVID did. Vaccine or no.
Here is the relevant section of Pfizer's Covid results presented to the FDA in early May. This is the only double-blind study of Pfizer's Covid shot on a population that was NOT wearing masks or social distanced.
Vaccine Efficacy % (95% CI)
6-23 Months of Age - 75.5% (-370.1, 99.6)
2-5 Years of Age - 82.3% (-8.0, 98.3)
So, Pfizer states unequivocally, that the calculated efficacy is in the 80% range but if they ran the same experiment on a population of the same size they would have a 95% probability of them calculating an efficacy somewhere in the range of -370 to 99. The negative numbers above mean the population had higher rates of infection from being vaccinated.
Pfizer's own results state unequivocally that they don't know if the vaccine works.
If you are going to reference the benefits of hospitalization rates for the vaccinated, don't bother, those results you read about are just studies after the fact, not verifiable experiments.
If you wonder how did Pfizer get the original 95% efficacy rate? Easy, the population was masked, socially distanced and staying home.
When you have the potential to make $20-30B off of the government's largesse you'll tell them what they want to hear.
Here is the relevant section of Pfizer's Covid results presented to the FDA in early May. This is the only double-blind study of Pfizer's Covid shot on a population that was NOT wearing masks or social distanced.
Vaccine Efficacy % (95% CI)
6-23 Months of Age - 75.5% (-370.1, 99.6)
2-5 Years of Age - 82.3% (-8.0, 98.3)
So, Pfizer states unequivocally, that the calculated efficacy is in the 80% range but if they ran the same experiment on a population of the same size they would have a 95% probability of them calculating an efficacy somewhere in the range of -370 to 99. The negative numbers above mean the population had higher rates of infection from being vaccinated.
Pfizer's own results state unequivocally that they don't know if the vaccine works.
If you are going to reference the benefits of hospitalization rates for the vaccinated, don't bother, those results you read about are just studies after the fact, not verifiable experiments.
If you wonder how did Pfizer get the original 95% efficacy rate? Easy, the population was masked, socially distanced and staying home.
When you have the potential to make $20-30B off of the government's largesse you'll tell them what they want to hear.
Well written! Explains exactly how it’s pretty much not provable at this point that the vaccine works. In terms of “stopping the spread” it was obviously a dismal failure
No way you can possibly prove that. It's not possible. There is zero way you or any doctor can tell if it's the vaccine lessened the symptoms or someone's immune system just fought it off, as the VAST majority of those that contracted COVID did. Vaccine or no.
Quote:
How will a vaccine prevent COVID-19?
The coronavirus that causes COVID-19 has spikes of protein on each viral particle. These spikes help the viruses attach to cells and cause disease. Some of the coronavirus vaccines are designed to help the body “recognize” these spike proteins and fight the coronavirus that has them.
An effective vaccine helps protect the person who receives it from serious illness, hospitalization and death. Widespread vaccination will help limit spread through communities and will restrict the virus’s opportunity to continue to mutate into new variants.
Geeeez. Climate change? Masks? What's next Roe V Wade? I thought this thread was about 1/6? It's about half the country wanting an end to democracy as long as they are the Junta on charge.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
