Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But no one tried to overthrow an election. He was simply asking not to certify votes from the states that had very suspicious activities. So, in other words, send them back and look at them again. He had every right to do that. Others have done so in the past. Its no big deal until the out of control lefty libs try to escalate it to something it wasn't.
No. Trump didn't want to certify votes in states that he lost by small margins.He took North Carolina by only 60,000 votes out of five million, but of course that wasn't suspicious to him. See the hypocrisy?
That's out of touch, this year with so many bad indicators there were better candidates than someone that was anti-abortion and still chose to vote against certification after Jan 6 and was strongly supported by Trump. Rob Astorino was from Westchester if you call that upstate, he does have name recognition on LI.
Curious, would you have voted for Suozzi if he won the primary.
There is a reason astorino got stomped in the primary. Time to get your head out of the sand.
No. Trump didn't want to certify votes in states that he lost by small margins.He took North Carolina by only 60,000 votes out of five million, but of course that wasn't suspicious to him. See the hypocrisy?
Of course they don't. This is the same set of people that simultaneously
chanted STOP THE COUNT in states where Trump was seemingly "winning"
chanted COUNT THE VOTES in states where Trump was seemingly "losing"
But no one tried to overthrow an election. He was simply asking not to certify votes from the states that had very suspicious activities. So, in other words, send them back and look at them again. He had every right to do that. Others have done so in the past. Its no big deal until the out of control lefty libs try to escalate it to something it wasn't.
The libs thought it was neat-o when Hillary and the rest of the deniers (some of whom voted against certifying the 2016 election) screamed about the illegitimate 2016 presidential election. And then the Russia collusion hoax started rolling.
Which is why normal folks merely chuckle when the libs now complain about election deniers and hoaxes. No matter how much they scream.
The libs thought it was neat-o when Hillary and the rest of the deniers (some of whom voted against certifying the 2016 election) screamed about the illegitimate 2016 presidential election. And then the Russia collusion hoax started rolling.
Which is why normal folks merely chuckle when the libs now complain about election deniers and hoaxes. No matter how much they scream.
We have a right to question an election, especially one where they allowed massive mail in ballots, suspended all election laws by having no signature verification and also not retaining any voting records for the length of time needed to verify them. They just all disappeared when they were going to be examined. How dare we question that.
The libs thought it was neat-o when Hillary and the rest of the deniers (some of whom voted against certifying the 2016 election) screamed about the illegitimate 2016 presidential election. And then the Russia collusion hoax started rolling.
Which is why normal folks merely chuckle when the libs now complain about election deniers and hoaxes. No matter how much they scream.
Hillary didn't try to extort state election officials though.
"Brad , just find me 11,780 votes "
We have a right to question an election, especially one where they allowed massive mail in ballots, suspended all election laws by having no signature verification and also not retaining any voting records for the length of time needed to verify them. They just all disappeared when they were going to be examined. How dare we question that.
Does that including storming the capitol and trying to strung yo the Republican VP? How is that even defendable? I'd love to be in the think tank room when they were figuring out how to spin 1/6.
Does that including storming the capitol and trying to strung yo the Republican VP? How is that even defendable? I'd love to be in the think tank room when they were figuring out how to spin 1/6.
And don't forget there were 33,500,000 mail-in ballots in the 2016 Presidential Election.
No complaints from the R party then .
Does that including storming the capitol and trying to strung yo the Republican VP? How is that even defendable? I'd love to be in the think tank room when they were figuring out how to spin 1/6.
OMG way to stawman. He’s asking for election accountability and you once again bring up 1/6. Newsflash almost no one cares. Exit polling showed that barely even register as a voting issue. Move on.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
