Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2008, 10:19 AM
 
1,700 posts, read 3,423,174 times
Reputation: 603

Advertisements

Probably in the "character adjustment" department. They don't worry about test scores there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2008, 01:02 PM
 
659 posts, read 2,516,216 times
Reputation: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc99 View Post
Who decides what's a "character issue"?

That's a great question. I am familiar with Grand Ave and since RICE has been implemented, there have been less physical altercations among students (impulse control) and more mediation and talking things out. They teach the kids to treat others with respect and think about what you say and how it affects others. Those are some character issues. ALso, lying, cheating, stealing. RICE isn't perfect, but on the middle school level, if it even gets some kids to be nicer to each other, lessen bullying,or foster understanding, isn't it worth a try???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 08:01 PM
 
Location: On a Slow-Sinking Granite Rock Up North
3,638 posts, read 6,165,606 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by llama8 View Post
I am familiar with this term. It is to address character issues in students. Unfortuantely, parents tend to not teach their kids correct, respectful behavior. Now schools need to do that. Rice is a national program about teaching respect.

Why would you criticize. Schools isn't all about test scores. It is about making better people. I take offense to the criticism of teachers. I teach HS and respect is a big componant.
I don't think it's all about criticizing teachers per se...personally, as a parent who has spent more than her fair share of time in classrooms, I think it's quite frustrating to watch children who clearly don't mind their manners, and how often teachers must "pussyfoot" around lest they be yelled at by Junior's irate parent. Respect is a big component without question, but I get more than a little miffed at the fact that instead of holding disruptive children accountable and getting them out of the classroom, teachers must now spend more time teaching them how to sit still and pay attention instead of focusing on subjects.

It used to be that they ran outside and screamed and hollered for 20 minutes or so mid-morning (in addition to lunchtime recess) to get the pent-up energy out. Now, they have to sit still and fill in the correct reading comprehension or mathematics bubble, and if they're lucky, they can scarf down their lunch in time to go out for 15 minutes. By today's standards, society is so focused on testing, testing, testing, that there is precious little time to spend on any kind of outside recess. That, IMO, only sets up a bigger profit margin for pharmaceutical companies. Kids are fidgety to begin with - now we expect them to sit still for 6 hours with a paltry 15 minute break? No wonder they have "character issues."

There's much to be said about child development, and no one appears to be saying it. Children are not mini-adults, they are a work in progress and as such, they shouldn't be made to sit like little brainy statues for extended periods of time without a break. That's a recipe for "character flaw" developments IMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 10:04 PM
 
929 posts, read 2,067,719 times
Reputation: 566
cue the teachers blaming everything on parents! oH? This just in, they've already started!

@OP. You have to understand that you need to lower your expectations for Long Island teachers. You see, they only make 3x the national average for teachers and have advanced degrees that proclaim them "specialists" in education. And you need to understand that the poor education your children receive is a direct result of your weaknesses as a parent. Maybe you should be home more with your kids! What? You need that second job because your property taxes are 10k per year for a 2 bed room ranch. Well, that's your fault too.

Oh, and you don't understand because your not a teacher. Nanny Nanny Poo Poo. Rubber/Glue. No Backsies

Seriously! If you want proper education for your children than you need to find a Catholic School on LI. Public Schools just want the path of least resistance. In other words, they just want it so your children don't cause trouble. It's the educational equivalent of a parent saying they "Just want Quiet!" If the teachers get that then your children will do well, but their education will be **** poor. If you want an education that will challenge your children and prepare them for Undergraduate studies than you need to find a strong private school on LI. Sad, but very true!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2009, 05:39 AM
 
5,047 posts, read 5,798,849 times
Reputation: 3120
My children go to parochial school and boy am I glad I send them there. But even there, we have issues with children who just do not want to abide by the rules. In my sons 3rd grade class, there are a bunch of 5 boys who just constantly disrupt the class. I am not one of those parents who says my son is perfect ; absolutely not. But he is one of the children who actually want to learn. He reads at 7th grade level(harry potter #5 now).
I had this specific teacher last year for my other son and she was just fantastic ; just one of those teachers who loved the children and loved to teach. Well this year she is jaded, tired, and constantly having to stop the class just to focus on the behaviour of these 5 boys. Wouldnt you think that the parents of these boys would know by now that this behaviour isnt tolerated. Last week one of them wrote all over the bathroom!! That is just not acceptable and its kids like those who want to learn that are affected.
The school does teach respect and does discipline but if the kids arent getting it at home, they just will not bring it to school with them.

d
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2009, 12:01 PM
 
544 posts, read 938,562 times
Reputation: 655
Quote:
The school does teach respect and does discipline but if the kids arent getting it at home, they just will not bring it to school with them.
Perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2009, 01:28 PM
 
791 posts, read 1,433,314 times
Reputation: 524
The sad truth is: it's part of the hangover from the go-go sixties. Just "understand" the little darlings, and they'll behave perfectly.

Oh, they don't? Then, they must have some mental disease and need to be medicated.

Kids, particularly boys, need an old fashioned kick in the ass when they misbehave, not "therapy."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2009, 05:13 AM
 
852 posts, read 2,016,890 times
Reputation: 325
Default I think you are wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sean sean sean sean View Post
Just a quick observation....

The other day I was up by Grand Avenue Middle School in Bellmore....I happened to glance at their little motto on the sign outside and it read:

RICE - Respect Impulse Control Compassion Equity

You'll notice there's nothing about learning. Respect, compassion and equity are all well and fine....but IMPULSE CONTROL? When did we stop aspiring to educate and challenge the minds of our children and start settling for docile and well behaved? It blew my mind, how can this pass for education? This is a well regarded school in a well regarded district....and they're telling these kids that the most important thing in life is to sit on your hands every time you want a candy bar?

I have a bunch of friends who are teachers on LI, and I dated a HS math teacher (at one of LI's best districts) for way too many years....and let me tell you, these people scare me. Everything they were taught in college and everything the districts look for isn't teaching ability, it's test scores and behavior control. Education on LI (and probably everywhere else), in my eyes, has just become a really expensive form of babysitting. Keep up appearances, and push the product down the assembley line....I personally think it's nuts.

Anyone else have any thoughts? I don't have any kids myself, so I can't comment on what the end result of modern education practices are.
I know plenty of teachers; I'm also married to one. The teachers I know want to teach, and they do teach. One of the barriers to instruction are the values instilled in the students that affect behavior. These values are taught either implicitly or explicitly by their parents and their culture. If students show up at a school feeling entitled to do, say, or not do whatever they please, it seems like instructing new values is warranted. At least making students aware of the values intrinsic to their behaviors is an important step in developing a capable young person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2009, 05:17 AM
 
852 posts, read 2,016,890 times
Reputation: 325
Default Wow

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomonlineli View Post
cue the teachers blaming everything on parents! oH? This just in, they've already started!

@OP. You have to understand that you need to lower your expectations for Long Island teachers. You see, they only make 3x the national average for teachers and have advanced degrees that proclaim them "specialists" in education. And you need to understand that the poor education your children receive is a direct result of your weaknesses as a parent. Maybe you should be home more with your kids! What? You need that second job because your property taxes are 10k per year for a 2 bed room ranch. Well, that's your fault too.

Oh, and you don't understand because your not a teacher. Nanny Nanny Poo Poo. Rubber/Glue. No Backsies

Seriously! If you want proper education for your children than you need to find a Catholic School on LI. Public Schools just want the path of least resistance. In other words, they just want it so your children don't cause trouble. It's the educational equivalent of a parent saying they "Just want Quiet!" If the teachers get that then your children will do well, but their education will be **** poor. If you want an education that will challenge your children and prepare them for Undergraduate studies than you need to find a strong private school on LI. Sad, but very true!
I haven't seen any stats that support your claims. Can you provide any support for these wild assertions?

Lots of name calling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2009, 05:25 AM
 
852 posts, read 2,016,890 times
Reputation: 325
Default Yes! Beat them!

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCardSteve View Post
The sad truth is: it's part of the hangover from the go-go sixties. Just "understand" the little darlings, and they'll behave perfectly.

Oh, they don't? Then, they must have some mental disease and need to be medicated.

Kids, particularly boys, need an old fashioned kick in the ass when they misbehave, not "therapy."
The problem is caused by the fact that we aren't beating our kids enough.

You can do better than rehashing Newt Gingrich here. The general problem, and it's an American problem, is entitlement and lack of parenting. Affluence in the US soared after WWII because families began sending both parents into the workplace. Once that didn't cut it because salaries flatlined in the 70s, usury laws were weakened, and people began using credit cards for everything. In the 90s, people yanked the equity out of their homes. Once indebted to their ears, Americans were accustomed to lifestyles they couldn't afford and were busy working their assess off just to stay above (according to the UN statistics, Americans are one of the hardest working peoples). You can't parent in that environment.

The "go-go sixties," as Hannity might put it, were a time of questioning authority when authority was busy denying rights to blacks and killing tens of thousands of working and lower class draftees. I don't see the connection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top